摘要
【目的】编制本土文化背景下具有良好信度效度的儿童早期家庭养育环境评价量表。【方法】经查阅文献和专家访谈,构建儿童养育环境条目库。分层随机抽取4市239名1-3岁儿童家长初步测试,探索性因素分析形成“1-3岁儿童家庭养育环境试用问卷”。再次分层随机抽取10个市县城区1-3岁儿童,完成591份“一般人口学问卷”、“1-3岁儿童家庭养育环境试用问卷”,部分儿童完成“0-4岁儿童神经心理发展量表”测评。对测评结果进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、信度检验和效度检验。【结果】“1-3岁儿童家庭养育环境问卷”由41个条目组成,包含4个因素;同质信度为0.930,分半信度为0.871,重测信度系数0.707;量表与儿童发育商的标准关联效度为0.475,内容效度和结构效度均达到良好水平。【结论】“1-3岁儿童家庭养育环境问卷”信度、效度等各项指标均达到测量学的要求,可以作为评价1-3岁儿童家庭养育环境的工具。
[Objective] To develop a early Child Home Nurture Environment Scales based on Chinese culture back- ground. [Methods] The items pools were established after reviewing a lot of correlative literatures and opened inquiry questionnaires fulfilled by experts. "1 - 3 years child nurture environment probative questionnaire" was made by exploratory factor analysis with data of 223 parents from 4 cities. Another exploratory factor analysis was carried out through 591 parents from 10 cities. Parts of 1 - 3 years children performed the test of "0 - 4 years child nerve and mental development scale". Critical ratio, pearson correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used for developing and evaluating the structure of the scales, reliability and validity. [Results] 1-3 years child home nurture environment questionnaire consisted of 41 items, which consisted of 4 factors. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0. 930, Guttman split-half reliability was 0. 871 ,test-retest reliability was 0. 707. Correlation coefficient between total score and child development quotient (DQ) was 0. 475. Content validity, construct validity and criterion-related validity all were satisfied. [Conclusion] 1-3 years Child Home Nurture Environment Questionnaire is entirely accord with psychometric demands,which can be used as a practicable instrument for people to evaluate child home environment.
出处
《中国儿童保健杂志》
CAS
2008年第6期650-652,共3页
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金
山东省医药卫生科技发展项目[(2005)105]
关键词
儿童家庭养育环境
量表
编制
信度
效度
child home nurture environment
scales
development
reliability
validity