期刊文献+

一种基于代理移动IPv6的全局移动性管理结构和协议 被引量:5

A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文定义一种基于代理移动IPv6的全局移动性管理结构和协议,简称为PMIPGMM。在PMIPGMM中,由网络实体而不是移动节点完成移动性管理,另外消除了移动节点和接入路由器之间分发数据的无线链路隧道负荷。为与熟知的层次移动IPv6协议比较,基于液体流移动性模型,分别给出了每个协议下,移动节点在平均域停留时间内产生的位置更新、数据分发和总费用函数。分别研究了各种系统参数对费用函数的影响。分析结果表明所提出的基于代理移动IPv6的全局移动性管理协议可以保证低的总费用。 This paper specifies a Proxy Mobile IPv6 based Global Mobility Management architecture and protocol procedure, named PMIPGMM. In PMIPGMM, the mobility management is performed by network entity other than mobile node itself. The other benefit is the elimination of the wireless link data delivery tunnel overhead between the mobile node and the access router. To compare with well known hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management protocol, the location update, the packet delivery and total cost functions generated by a mobile node during its average domain residence time in each protocol are formulated based on fluid flow mobility model. Then, the impacts of various system parameters on the cost functions are analyzed, respectively. The analysis results indicate that the proposed proxy mobile IPv6 based global mobility management protocol can guarantees lower total costs.
出处 《电子与信息学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期2999-3004,共6页 Journal of Electronics & Information Technology
基金 国家973规划项目(2007CB307101) 国家自然科学基金(60573001 60674008) 高等学校科技创新工程重大项目培育资金(706005)资助课题
关键词 全局移动性管理 代理移动IPV6 层次移动IPV6 液体流移动性模型 费用函数 Global mobility management Proxy mobile IPv6 Hierarchical mobile IPv6 Fluid flow mobility model Cost function
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Johnson D, Perkins C, and Arkko J. Mobility support in IPv6. RFC 3775. June 2004.
  • 2Gundavelli S, Letmg K, and Devarapalli V, et al.. Proxy mobile IPv6. draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-10. February 2008.
  • 33GPP, 3GPP system architecture evolution (SAE): Report on technical options and conclusions. 3GPP TR 23.882 0.10.1. February 2006.
  • 4ITU-T Draft New Recommendation Q. MMF, Generic Framework of Mobility Management for Next-Generation Networks (version 1.5). September 2007.
  • 5Sarikaya B and Xia F. DHCPv6 based home network prefix delegation for PMIPv6. draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefix- delegation-01. November 2007.
  • 6Troan O and Droms R. IPv6 prefix options for dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) version 6. RFC 3633. December 2003.
  • 7Lior A, Chowdhury K, and Tschofenig H. RADIUS mobile IPv6 support, draft-ietf-mip6-radius-03. November 2007.
  • 8Vixie P, Thomson S, and Rekhter Y, et al.. Dynamic updates in the domain name system (DNS UPDATE). RFC 2136. April 1997.
  • 9Soliman H, Castelluccia C, and El Malki K, et al.. Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6). RFC 4140. August 2005.
  • 10Chowdhury K and Yegin A. MIP6-bootstrapping for the integrated scenario.draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping- integrated -dhc-04. June 2007.

同被引文献41

  • 1郑龙,刘敬军,罗鹏程,周经伦.C^3I系统的网络可靠性综述[J].计算机技术与发展,2006,16(4):11-13. 被引量:6
  • 2Johnson D, Perkins C, and Arkko J. RFC 3775 mobility support in IPv6[S]. Reston, VA, USA, Internet Society, 2004.
  • 3Koodli R. RFC 5568 Mobile IPv6 fast handovers [S]. Reston, VA, USA, Internet Society, 2009.
  • 4Soliman H, Castelluccia C, and Elmalki K. RFC 5380 hierarchical mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) mobility management IS]. Reston, VA, USA, Internet Society, 2008.
  • 5Gundavelli S, Leung K, and Devarapalli V. RFC 5213 proxy mobile IPv6[S]. Reston, VA, USA, Internet Society, 2008.
  • 6Yokota H, Chowdhury K, Koodli R, et al.. RFC 5949 fast handovers for proxy mobile IPv6[S]. Reston, VA, USA, Internet Society, 2010.
  • 7Oh S and Choo H. Low latency handover scheme based on optical buffering at LMA in proxy MIPv6 networks[C]. Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA 2009, Seoul, 2009: 479-490.
  • 8Lee Jong-hyouk, Kim Yeong-heok, and Lee Dong-woo. Enhanced handover process for proxy mobile IPv6[C]. 2010 4th International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Cebu, 2010: 105-108.
  • 9Yan Zhi-wei, Zhang Si-dong, Zhou Hua-chun, et al.. Network mobility support in PMIPv6 network[C]. Proceedings of the 6th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, Caen, 2010: 890-894.
  • 10Ali D and Andreas M T. Comparative analysis of proxy MIPv6 and fast MIPv6[C]. Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access, Tenerife, 2009: 26-33.

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部