期刊文献+

脑瘤术后超分割加三维适形放疗疗效分析 被引量:1

Hyperfractionated and three-dimension conformal radiotherapy in treatment of brain neoplasm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脑瘤术后超分割加三维适形放疗(3-DCRT)的疗效及不良反应。方法脑瘤术后病例60例,随机分A组30例,B组30例。A组接受超分割加3-DCRT,剂量DT66~74Gy;B组接受常规放疗,剂量DT56~60Gy,对比两组的疗效及不良反应。结果肿瘤消退率:A组86.7,B组60.0,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);1、3、5年总生存率:A组分别80.0、53.3、30.0;B组分别为60.0、46.7、26.7;5年局部复发率:A组43.3,B组53.3,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);脑水肿发生率:A组36.7,B组30.0,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超分割加3-DCRT治疗脑瘤术后,近期疗效优于常规放疗,两组脑水肿发生率无统计学意义。 Objective To investigate the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of hyperfractionated and three-dimension conformal radiotherapy for brain neoplasm. Methods Sixty patients with brain neoplasms were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty patients in Group A were treated by hyperfractionated and three-dimension conformal radiotherapy (3- DCRT) with a total dose of DT 66-74 Gy; 30 patients in Group B were treated with conventional radiotherapy with a total dose of 56-60 Gy. The efficacy and side effects of two groups were evaluated. Results The response rate of Group A and Group B were 86. 7% and 60. 0%, respectively (P 〈0. 05). The 1-yeay, 3-year and 5-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 80.0%,53.3%,30.0% and 60. 0%,46. 7%,26. 7%,respectively. The 5-year local relapse rates of Group A and Group B were 43.3% and 53.3% ,respectively, (P〉0.05). The incidence of cerebral edema was 36.7% in Group A and 30.0% in Group B (P〉0. 05). Conclusion The response rate of 3-DCRT in treatment of brain neoplasm is higher than that of the conventional radiotherapy,there is no difference in incidence of cerebral edema between two groups.
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2008年第6期544-546,共3页 Journal of Practical Oncology
关键词 脑肿瘤/放射疗法 放射疗法 适形/方法 肿瘤复发 局部 预后 brain neoplasms/radiotherapy radiotherapy,conformal/methods neoplasm recurrence,local prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献13

  • 1谷铣之 殷蔚伯 等.肿瘤放射治疗学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1997.807.
  • 2胡逸民.现代放射治疗学进展[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1998.3.
  • 3Shaw EG, Bourland D, Marshall MG. Cancer of the central nervous system[A]. Khan FM, Potish RA. Treatment planning in radiation oncology [M]. Pennsyllvania:Williams and Wilkins, 1998.491-544.
  • 4Hochberg FH, Pruitt A. Assumption in the radiotherapy of glioblstoma[J]. Neurol, 1980,30(9):907.
  • 5Sheline GE. Radiotherapy for high grade gliomas[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1990, 18(4):793.
  • 6Rauhut F,Stolke D,Combined surgery and radiotherapy of invasive pituitary adenomas problems of radiogenic encephalopathy.Acta Neurochir Suppl Wien,1996,65:37-40.
  • 7Flickinger JC,Lunsford LD,Kondziolka D,et al.Radiosurgery and brain tolevance,An analysis of neurodiagnostic imaging changes after gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1992,23:19-26.
  • 8Voges J,Tarald H,Sturm V,et al.analysis of linear accelerator radiosurgery.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1996,36:1055-1063.
  • 9Kjelleerg RN,Hanamura T,Davis KR,et al.Bragg peak proton beam therapy for arterivenous malformations of the brain.N Engl J Med,1993,309:269-274.
  • 10李庆琪,黄鸿年.脑胶质瘤术后放疗104例分析[J]中国放射肿瘤学,1988(01).

共引文献41

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部