摘要
血凝抑制试验(HI)是评价季节性流感疫苗免疫效果的经典方法。由于对人、禽流感病毒的受体不同,不同来源的红血球检测敏感性可能有差异。实验中比较了经典的鸡血球HI方法和国外报道的马血球HI方法,发现两种方法在检测大流行流感疫苗接种者血清时,于不同毒株抗原检测时表现各不相同,检测结果差异在2倍之内,说明经典的鸡血球HI方法仍适用于评价大流行流感疫苗的免疫效果。
The hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assay is a traditional method for assessing immune responses to influenza virus. It is well known that the receptors for avian and human influenza virus on the host cells are different; therefore, HI test based on red ceils from various species of animals containing different receptors may have different sensitivity. In this study, The traditional chicken red cells-based HI ( cHI ) with horse red ceils based-HI (hHI ) methods was compared in the detection of antibodies against H5N1 influenza virus. It found that two kinds of method have different performances when 3 kinds of HI antigens were used, but the differences between two assays were roughly within the 2-fold range. Therefore, the traditional chicken red ceils-based HI is still suitable for the serological evaluation of pandemic influenza vaccines.
出处
《微生物学免疫学进展》
2008年第4期60-63,共4页
Progress In Microbiology and Immunology
关键词
大流行流感疫苗
血凝抑制试验
马血球
鸡血球
Pandemic influenza vaccines
Hemagglutination-inhibition ( HI ) assay
Horse red cells
Chicken red ceils