期刊文献+

是历史在重演吗?--从美国的“城市更新”到中国的“旧城改造” 被引量:11

IS HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF?——FROM US' "URBAN RENEWAL" TO CHINA'S "OLD CTIY RECONSTRUCTION"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国1950—1960年的"城市更新"与中国20世纪80年代后期开始的"旧城改造"有相似可比之处。这两种形式的城市再发展都是以改善旧城居住条件的名义,运用政府职权和公共补贴去帮助大规模的私人或准私人投资项目。尽管两者很类似,但是美国的城市更新是由地方政府和商业开发投资者共同合作去振兴衰败的城市中心地带,相比较而言,中国的旧城改造是由新兴的地方精英所推动的,他们通过旧城改造项目在蓬勃发展的房地产市场中追逐经济的快速增长。 It is worthy for having a comparison between urban renewal in the United States from the 1950s to 1960s and inner-city redevelopment in China since the late 1980s. It finds that both programs use government authority and subsidies to make large-scale private or quasi-private investment attractive in the name of ameliorating living conditions. Despite the similarities, America's urban renewal was an program in which the local government and downtown business interests cooperated to boost declining inner-cities that were competing with burgeoning suburbs. In contrast, China's redevelopment has been propelled by emerging local elites using decentralized state power to pursue fast growth in rising real estate markets.
作者 章岩 方可
机构地区 世界银行
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第12期45-50,共6页 Economic Theory and Business Management
关键词 城市更新 再发展 成长机器 成长联盟 urban renewal redevelopment growth machine growth coalition
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Zhang Tingwei. Urban Development and a Socialist Pro-growth Coalition in Shanghai [J] . Urban Affairs Review, 2002, (4): 475-499.
  • 2Zhang Yan, Ke Fang. Politics of Housing Redevelopment in China-The Rise and Fall of the Ju'er Hutong Project in Inner-city Beijing [J] . Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 2003, (1): 75-87.
  • 3John Mollenkopf. The Contested City [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.

同被引文献160

引证文献11

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部