主客体关系是哲学的基本问题吗?——与吕国忱同志商榷

Is the Relation between Subject and Object the Basic Question of Philosophy?——Discussion with Comrade LV Guo-chen

吕国忱的《列宁主体客体观的重大转变——<唯批>与<哲学笔记>之比较研究》一文,误解了《唯批》对经验批判主义批判的实质,任意歪曲、篡改列宁关于主体、客体的本意,错误地认为《哲学笔记》肯定了经验批判主义的根源即主客体的统一,而《唯批》却发生了否定主客体统一的错误。该文所确认的现象、感性认识和理性认识同时含有主观和客观两种因素,是向马赫主义的复归;其所提出的哲学的基本问题是主客体关系问题,更是对唯心主义的妥协,对唯物主义的背离。

In “The Significant Transformation of Lenin＇s Theory of Subject and Object： A Comparative Study of“Criticism ofMaterialism”and “PhilosophicalNotes”, the author didn＇t understand the criticism on empiriocriticism in “Criticism of Materialism”--essentially empiriocriticism is subjective idealism, distorted and adulterated Lenin＇s real idea on subject and object at random, thought wrongly that“PhilosophicalNotes” atTtrmed the origin ofempiriocriticism, the unity of subject and object, but that “Criticism of Materialism” made a mistake of denying the unity of subject and object. Phenomenon, perceptual and rational knowledge proposed in the article was both subjective and objective. Basic philosophical problem advanced in the article was the problem of the relation between subject and object, which not only compromised to mentalism but also deviated from materialism, In fact, basic philosophical problem is the problem of the relation between consciousness and material and that between thinking and being.