期刊文献+

Hunt-Hess Ⅲ~Ⅳ级动脉瘤破裂病人不同时期血管内治疗刘玉和

OBSERVATION OF THE EFFECT OF HUNT-HESS GRADE Ⅲ~Ⅳ ANEURYSM TREATMENT WITH ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION IN DIFFERENT STAGE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对102例Hunt-Hess Ⅲ~Ⅳ级动脉瘤破裂病人不同时期行血管内治疗的回顾性疗效分析,探讨治疗时间的选择对该类患者疗效的影响,为临床治疗提供参考。方法:回顾性分析102例Hunt-Hess Ⅲ~Ⅳ级动脉瘤破裂病例,其中急性期治疗组(治疗时间于发病后72h以内)63例,痉挛期治疗组(治疗时间于发病后3~14d)39例,通过比较二者在再出血率、术中动脉瘤破裂发生率、脑血管痉挛发生率、住院期间病死率、术后随访恢复良好率等方面的差异,探讨治疗时机的选择对患者预后的影响。结果:两组患者在再出血率、脑血管痉挛发生率、住院期间病死率方面,急性期治疗组明显低于痉挛期治疗组,术后随访恢复良好率明显优于对照组,差别均有统计学意义。术中动脉瘤破裂发生率方面二者无显著差别。结论:对Hunt-Hess Ⅲ~Ⅳ级动脉瘤破裂患者尽早实施血管内治疗,可降低患者再出血发生率,提高患者生存率,改善预后。 Objective :To observe the therapeutic effect of the 102 patients who treated with Endovascular Embolization in different stage retrospectively. Methods.102 cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage of Hunt-Hess grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ were divided into two groups. 63 patients in acute stage treatment group were treated before onset 72h and 39 cases in vasospasm stage treatment group were treated after onset 3-14d. Then rehemorrhage rate, incidence rate of intraoperative aneurismal rupture, cerebral vasospasm, hospital mortality, and favorable rate of recovery between two groups were compared. Results : Rehemorrhage rate, incidence rate of cerebral vaso-spasm and hospital mortality of patients in acute treatment group was obviously lower than control group ;favorable rate of recovery was higher;the difference between the two groups had statistic meaning. Incidence rate of intraoperative aneurismal rupture had no significant difference. Conclusion : Active and effective endovascular embolization treatment for Hunt-Hess Grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ Aneurysm in acute Stage could obviously lower rehemorrhage rate while elevating survival rate, improving living quality.
作者 刘玉和
出处 《牡丹江医学院学报》 2008年第4期32-34,共3页 Journal of Mudanjiang Medical University
关键词 HUNT-HESS Ⅲ-Ⅳ级 脑动脉瘤 血管内治疗 急性期 痉挛期 grade Hunt - Hess Ⅲ-Ⅳ cerebral aneurysm Endovascular Embolization acute stage vasospasm stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1DonauerE, ReifJ, Al- KhalatB, etal. Intraventricularhaemorrhage caused by aneurysm sand angiom as. Acta Neurochir( W ien), 1993, 122(1 -2) :23 -31.
  • 2Vinnulia F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg, 1997,86:475 -482.
  • 3Molyneux A J, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm triM(ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet,2005,366:809 - 817.
  • 4Bracard S, Lebedinsky A, Anxionnat R, et al. Endovascular treatment of hunt and hess grade IVand Vaneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002,23:953 - 957.
  • 5Dorfler A, Wanke I, Dietrich U, et al. Endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms and vasospasm. Zentralbl Neurochir,1999,60 : 1210.
  • 6Juvela S, Porras, M, Heiskanen O. Natural history of unruptured intracranial anerrysms: A long - term follow - up study. J Neurosurh, 1993,79,174.
  • 7Juvela S. Rebleeding from ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol, 1989,32:323.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部