期刊文献+

脑神经胶质瘤磁敏感加权成像与病理分级之间的关系 被引量:7

Relationship between magnetic susceptibility-weighted imaging and pathologic grading of brain gliomas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨磁敏感加权成像(magnetic susceptibility-weighted imaging,MSWI)在评估脑神经胶质瘤病理分级中的价值。方法:对60例病理学证实为脑神经胶质瘤的患者行磁共振(magnetic resonance,MR)快速自旋回波(turbo spin echo,TSE)和双回波快速小角度激发(fast low angle shot,FLASH)-T2*WI(TE为15和35ms)磁敏感序列扫描。比较这3种序列所产生的磁敏感伪影(magnetic susceptibility artifact,MSA)的差异。对MSA[个数、最大直径和最低信噪比(signal-to-noise ratio,SNR)]与WHO病理分级和Ki-67的表达进行相关性分析。结果:多样本秩和检验和独立样本方差分析FLASH-T2*WI(TE为15和35ms)和TSE序列这3种序列的MSA差异有统计学意义(χ2=21.331,P=0.001;F=44.517和6.839,P<0.001)。Pearson相关分析显示,WHO病理分级与MSA的个数、最大直径和SNR均相关(r分别为0.737、0.624和-0.528,P=0.000);Ki-67的表达与MSA的个数、最大直径和SNR也均相关(r分别为0.687、0.577和-0.533,P=0.000)。结论:应用MSWI可有效地评价术前脑神经胶质瘤的病理分级,且利用延长TE时间所产生的MSA可以更好地对脑神经胶质瘤的病理分级进行评估。 Objectives: To estimate the value of magnetic susceptibility-weighted imaging (MSWI) in the pathologic grading of gliomas. Materials:Sixty patients with confirmed gliomas proved by pathological examination were prospectively examined. They were scanned by magnetic resonance (MR) turbo spin echo (TSE) T1-weighted imaging (WI) and dual fast low angle shot (FLASH)-T2 ^* WI imaging with TE of 15 and 35 ms, respectively. The difference in the magnetic susceptibility artifact (MSA) induced by the various sequences was compared. The correlation of MSA [ number, maximal diameter, and signal to noise ratio (SNR) ] with WHO pathological grade and Ki-7 values were analyzed. Results: Multiplicity rank sum test and variance analysis indicated that there was a statistical difference in MSA between the three sequences, 15-ms FLASH-T2* WI, 35-ms FLASH-T2^* WI, and TSE (X2 = 21. 331, P = 0. 001; F =44.517 and 6.839 ,P 〈0.001 ). Pearson correlation analysis suggested that WHO pathological grade correlated with MSA parameters including number, maximal diameter and SNR (r = 0.737, 0. 624 and - 0. 528, P = 0.000) ; the expression level of Ki-67 also correlated with MSA parameters including number, maximal diameter and SNR (r =0.687, 0. 577, and -0.533, P =0.000). Conclusions: MSWI is helpful in the evaluation of preoperative pathologic grade of brain gliomas. MSA produced by longer TE FLASH (35 ms) is better than that produced by shorter TE FLASH ( 15 ms) to evaluate the pathologic grade of brain gliomas.
出处 《肿瘤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期1077-1080,共4页 Tumor
关键词 神经胶质瘤 磁共振成像 病理学 Glioma Magnetic resonance imaging Pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1KNOPP EA, CHA S, JOHNSON G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2- weighted MR imaging[ J]. Radiology, 1999, 211(3) :791-798.
  • 2HAACKE M E, HERIGAULT G, YU Y J, et al. Observing tumor vascularity noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging [ J ]. Image Anal Stereol, 2002, 21 ( 8 ) : 107-113.
  • 3任伯绪,史河水,孔祥泉,刘定西,李欣,吴汉平,余建明.磁敏感成像序列对颅内海绵状血管瘤的诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(11):960-963. 被引量:33
  • 4SEHGAL V, DELPROPOSTO Z, HAACKE M E, et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 22(4) :439-450.
  • 5RECHT L, TORRES CO, SMITH TW, et al. Transferrin receptor in normal and neoplastic brain tissue: implications for brain-tumor immunotherapy [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 1990, 72 ( 6 ) :941-945.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Polymeropoulos MH, Hurko O. Hsu F, et al. Linkage of the locus for cerebral cavermous hemagiomas to human chromosome 7q in four families of Mexican-American descent. Neurology, 1997, 6:752
  • 2Atlas SW, Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. New York: Lippincott Raven, 1996, 516
  • 3刘定西 于群.MR成像分册[M].武汉:湖北科技出版社,2001.64.
  • 4许乙凯 郑木明.现代CT与MRI诊断[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003.306.
  • 5王建军,高元桂.头颅海绵状血管瘤的影像学诊断[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2001,9(2):137-138. 被引量:14

共引文献32

同被引文献81

  • 1张竞文,伍建林,苗延巍,张清,宋清伟.磁共振弥散加权成像对脑肿瘤瘤周水肿的临床应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(12):1810-1814. 被引量:18
  • 2冯逢,有慧,胡凌,王含,郑福玲,金征宇,崔丽英.磁敏感加权成像鉴别多系统萎缩与特发性帕金森病的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(6):781-784. 被引量:50
  • 3Sugahara T,Korogi Y,Kochi M,et al.Usefulness of diffu-sion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation ofcellularity of gliomas.J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,9:53-60.
  • 4Stadnik TW,Chaskis C,Michotte A,et al.Diffusion-weigh-ted MR imaging of intracerebral masses:comparison with conven-tional MR imaging and histologic fingdings.AJNR,2001,22:969-979.
  • 5Tomczak R,Wunderlich A,Gorich J,et al.Brain abscessesin diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)-comparison to cystic braintumors [J].Radiologe,2003,43(8):661-664.
  • 6Desprechins B,Stadnid T,Koerts G,et al.Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracere- bral necrotic tumors and cerebal abscesses[J].AJNR,1999,20:1252-1257.
  • 7Nadal DL,Herlidou S.Differential MRI diagnosis betweenbrain abscesses and necrotic or cystic brain tumors using the appar -ent diffusion coefficient and normalized diffusion-weighted images[J].Magn Reson Imaging,2003,21:645-650.
  • 8Sehgal V,Delproposto Z,Haccke EM,et al.Clinical applica-tions of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging [J].MagnReson Imaging,2005,22(4):439-450.
  • 9Reichenbach JR,Venkatesan R,Schillinger DJ,et al.Smallvessels in the Human brain:MR venography with deoxyhemoglo-bin as an in-trinsic contrast agent[J].Radiology,1997,204(1):272.
  • 10Reichenbach JR,Barth M,Haacke EM,et al.High-resolu-tion MR venography at 3.0 Tesla[J].Comput Assist Tomogr,2000,24 (6):949-957.

引证文献7

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部