期刊文献+

修辞问句的认知机制 被引量:2

Cognitive Mechanism of Rhetorical Questions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借助Panther&Thornburg的言语行为转喻理论,揭示修辞问句所实施的两种言语行为提问和陈述之间的关系。通过建立修辞问句言语行为实施的场景模型,发现了提问和陈述两种行为间具有转喻关系,即提问可以通过突显修辞问句场景模型内的任一部分来转喻陈述。同时,这种转喻关系解释了为什么修辞问句的听话人能快速地解读说话人的交际意图。 The present study, in drawing upon the theory of speech act metonymy put forward by Panther & Thornburg, tries to unearth the mechanism lying behind the use of rhetorical questions, or the relationship between the act of asking questions and that of making statements. By establishing tentatively the scenario of making statements by rhetorical questions, we hold that the two acts are of metonymic relationship. To be specific, the speaker is able to make statements by asking rhetorieal questions through highlighting one of the components of the RQ Scenario. At the same time, the scenario also facilitates the ease of the hearer' s understanding of the speaker' s intentions.
作者 王鑫
出处 《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第6期119-122,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社科基金项目"语词构块式音义象征关系理论研究"(编号:07BYY001)的阶段性成果
关键词 提问 陈述 言语行为转喻 修辞问句场景模型 asking question making statement speech act metonymy RQ scenario
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1[1]Quirk,et al.A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M].London:Longman,1985.
  • 2[2]Biber,et al.Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English[M].Beijing:Foreign Language and Research Press,2000.
  • 3[3]Schmidt Radefeldt J.On so-called "rhetorical" questions[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1977,(1):375~392.
  • 4[4]Frank J.You call that a rhetorical question? Forms and functions of rhetorical questions in conversation[J].Journal of pragmatics,1990,(14):723~738.
  • 5[5]Ilie C.Question-response argumentation in talk shows[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1999,(31):975~999.
  • 6[6]Han Chunghye.Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions[J].Lingua,2002,(112):201~229.
  • 7[7]Dumitrescu D.Rhetorical vs.non-rhetorical allo-repetition:the case of Romanian interrogatives[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1996,(26):321~354.
  • 8徐盛桓.疑问句探询功能的迁移[J].中国语文,1999(1):3-11. 被引量:102
  • 9[9]Austin J L.How to Do Things with Words[M].Beijing:Foreign Language and Research Press,2002.
  • 10[10]Searle J.Speech Acts:An Essay in the Philosophy of Language[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.

二级参考文献20

  • 1张伯江.认识观的语法表现[J].当代语言学,1997(2):15-19. 被引量:134
  • 2王甦 汪圣安.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996,2..
  • 3Bach, K. &. Harnish, R. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1979.
  • 4Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 5Gordon, David & Lakoff, George. Conversational postulates[A].In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan(eds.). Speech Acts(Syntax and Semantics 3) [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975 : 187-210.
  • 6Hernandez, L. P. & de Mendoza, F. J. R. Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002(34) :259-284.
  • 7Lakoff,George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 8Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics [M]. New York:Longman, 1983.
  • 9Levinson, Stephen. Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 10Morgan, Jerry L. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts[A]. In :Peter Cole, (ed.). Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1978:261-280.

共引文献146

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部