期刊文献+

青岛市园景树模糊综合评判 被引量:1

Landscape Trees Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in Qingdao
下载PDF
导出
摘要 园景树在城市园林建设中有广阔的应用前景,是城市绿化的重要材料。使用模糊综合评判法对青岛市常用的园景树进行评判,为城市绿化工作提供指导。从观赏性、适应性和生长特性三方面出发,选取了树形、绿期、耐寒性、寿命等12项指标,对各树种进行综合评价。筛选出白皮松、玉兰、柿树等优良树种。为城市树种评判进行了有益的探索。 Landscape trees which is an important material of urban greening, have abroad application prospects. According to the 12 selected indicators about appreciation quality, adaptability and growth characteristics, such as tree form, the green stage, cold resistance and life expectancy, the landscape trees commonly used in Qingdao were judged in the way of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for providing guidance of urban greening. Screening of some fine trees, such as Pinus bungeana .Magnolia denudata .Diospyros kaki and so on. The study did a useful experiment in the evaluation of urban tree species.
出处 《北方园艺》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第12期142-144,共3页 Northern Horticulture
基金 青岛市建委资助项目(20031)
关键词 树种选择 模糊综合评判 园景树 青岛 Selection of tree species Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation Landscape tree Qingdao
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

共引文献417

同被引文献19

  • 1郑芷青.广州城市行道树特征分析[J].城市环境与城市生态,1996,9(3):38-41. 被引量:28
  • 2彭立华,陈爽,刘云霞,王进.Citygreen模型在南京城市绿地固碳与削减径流效益评估中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(6):1293-1298. 被引量:70
  • 3Bolund P, Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban area. Ecological Economics, 29: 293-301.
  • 4Clark JR, Matheny NP. 1998. A model of urban forest sustainability :Application to cities in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture, 24: 17-39.
  • 5Dwyer MC, Miller RW. 1999. Using GIS to assess urban tree canopy benefits and surrounding greenspace distributions. Journal of Arboriculture, 25: 102 -106.
  • 6Ma N, Chen W, He XY. 2011. Structure and Ecological Benefits Evaluation of Street Trees in Shenyang Based on i-Tree (STRATUM) Model. The 2011 International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring, Changsha, China. Washington : IEEE Computer Society : 1295-1298.
  • 7McPherson EG, Gable M,Jahn D,et al. 2008. City of Pittsburgh ,Pennsylvania Municipal Forest Resource Analysis. Center for Urban Forest Research, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station : 4-9.
  • 8McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ,et at. 2003. Northern Mountain and Prairie Community Tree Guide : Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting. Davis, CA: Center for Urban Forest Research, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station : 7-16.
  • 9McPherson EG. 2003. A benefit-cost analysis of ten street tree species in Modesto, California, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture, 29: 1-8.
  • 10Miller RW. 1996. Urban Forestry. New Jersey ; Prentice Hall.

引证文献1

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部