期刊文献+

社群主义与自由主义之间本体论差异的辨析——基于泰勒与柏林自由观的比较分析

The Discrimination between the Ontology of Communitarianism and Liberalism:the Analysis of Comparison between Taylor's and Berlin's Notion of Freedom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自由主义者以赛亚.柏林与社群主义者查尔斯.泰勒都认可自由是重要的价值规范,但前者把自由看作是免于外在干涉的个人的选择自由,后者则把参与自治看作是自由的实质。二者自由观的差异体现着自由主义与社群主义之间的本体论差异,即个人与社会何为本原的差异。自由主义认为应当依据个人的性质来解释社会的行动、结构和状况,应当依据个人的善来解释社会的善;而社群主义则认为应当依据社会来解释构成性的个人,应当依据社会的共同善来解释个人的善。 Isaiah Berlin and Charles Taylor, one liberal and one eommunitarian respectively, recognized that freedom was an important value system, but their notions of freedom were very different. The former defined freedom as individual freedom of choice independent of interference by others, while the latter claimed self-rule was the essence of freedom. The difference between the notions of freedom embodies the difference between the ontology of communitarianism and liberalism, that is, whether society or individual is noumenon. The liberalism claims one ought to account for social actions, structures, and conditions in terms of properties of the constituent individuals, and account for social goods in terms of the individual goods ; but the communitarianism claims that one should account for the constituent individuals in terms of the society, and account for the individual goods in terms of the social goods.
作者 宁乐锋
机构地区 南开大学哲学系
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期117-122,共6页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 柏林 泰勒 原子论 整体论 自由主义 社群主义 Berlin Taylor atomism holism liberalism communitafianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1以赛亚·柏林.自由论[M].南京:译林出版社,2003.168.
  • 2Charles Taylor. "What' s wrong with negative liberty", in Philosophy and the Human Sciences [ M]. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 3霍布斯.利维坦[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985..
  • 4Charles Taylor. The Ethics of Authenticity [ M ]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991.
  • 5乔治·克劳德.自由主义与价值多元论[M].应奇,等译.南京:江苏人民出版社.2006.
  • 6查尔斯·泰勒.善的多元性[C]∥马克·里拉,罗纳德·德沃金,罗伯特·西尔维斯,编.以赛亚·柏林的遗产.刘擎,殷莹,译.北京:新星出版社.2006.
  • 7莱斯诺夫.二十世纪的政治哲学家[M].北京:商务印书馆.2001.
  • 8Charles Taylor. Cross - Purposes : The Liberal - Communitarian Debate, in Philosophical Arguments [ M ]. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997.
  • 9Charles Taylor. "Atomism", in Philosophy and the Human Sciences [ M]. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

共引文献340

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部