期刊文献+

基于嵌套Logit模型的旅游者目的地选择影响因素分析 被引量:2

Analysis of Influential Factors of Destination Choice Based on NMNL Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借鉴分类策略和选择域理论,将NMNL(Nested Multinomial Logit)模型用来分析情感映象和约束因素在目的地选择过程中的作用。对影响因素进行问卷调查后,采用统计软件stata 10.0进行分析。其中,约束因素包括对目的地的了解程度、没人同行、他人评价、人太多、交通不便、距离太远、费用太高,情感映象则用"愉快的—不愉快的"、"放松的—烦恼的"、"唤起的—沉睡的"、"兴奋的—沮丧的"这四维尺度来评价,得出结论:旅游者对某一目的地的情感映象越好,并且该目的地被感知的约束因素越少,该目的地被选择的机率也就越大。 Trough the introduction of choice set concept and NMNL( Nested Muhinomial Logit) model, the paper explained tourists' decision - making process by investing the roles of categorization, affective images and constraints. The data gained via the survey and was analyzed by statistical software stata 10.0. In the questionnaire, constraints include how well tourists knowing about a destination, nobody to go with, the estimation of somebody, too crowed, inconvenient transportation, too far, and high expense. And affective images were estimated by four - dimensional scale, such as pleasant - unpleasant, relaxing - distressing, arousing - sleepy, exciting - gloomy. The paper has reached a conclusion: the better affective images about a destination, and the less perceived constraints, the more probability of the destination to be chosen.
作者 熊勇清 彭希
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期139-143,159,共6页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 分类 目的地选择 影响因素 NMNL模型 categorization destination choice influence factors NMNL model
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献57

  • 1Ainslie, A. , R. Andrews and I. Curfim (2001), An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete vs. continuous representation of heterogeneity, working Paper, Department of Business Administration, University of Delaware.
  • 2Ben - Akiva, M. (1972), The Structure of Travel Demand Models [D], PhD thesis, MIT.
  • 3Ben - Akiva, M. and D. Boldue (1996), Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure, Working Paper, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT.
  • 4Ben - Akiva, M. and S. Lerman (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand [M], MIT Press, Cambridge, Massahusetts.
  • 5Berkovec, J. and S. Stern (1991), Job Exit Behavior of Older Men [J], Econometrica, 59 (1) :189-210.
  • 6Berry, S. (1994), Estimating discrete choice models of product differentiation [J], RAND Journal of Economics, 25: 242-262.
  • 7Bhat, C. (1998), Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level - of- service variables in travel mode choice models [J], Transportation Research A 32: 495-510.
  • 8Bhat, C. (2001), Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work mode choice modeling [J], Transportation Science, 34: 228-238.
  • 9Bolduc, D. , B. Fortin, and M. A. Fournier (1996), The Impact of Incentive Policies on the Practical Location of Doctors: A Multinomial Probit Analysis [J], Journal of Labor Economics, 14:703-732.
  • 10Boyd, J. and J. Mellman (1980), The effect of fuel economy standards on the u.s. automotive market., a hedonic demand analysis [J], Transportation Research A 14:367-378.

共引文献110

同被引文献35

  • 1Kraan M, Huynh H S M N. Traveler responses to advanced traveler information systems for shopping trips: interactive survey approach[J]. Transporta- tion Research Board, 2000, 1725 (0361-1981):116- 123.
  • 2Mahmassani H S, Huynh N, Srinivasan K, et al. Tripmaker choice behavior for shopping trips under real-time information: model formulation and results of stated-preference internet-hased interactive experi- ments[J]. Transportation Research Board, 2003, 10(6) : 311-321.
  • 3Rochat A D. Understanding individual travel deci- sions: results from a commuters survey in Geneva [J]. Transportation, 1999, 26(3) :263-281.
  • 4Yim Youngbin. Evaluation of travinfo TM field oper- ational test[D]. California: University of California at Berkeley Institute of Transportation, 2000.
  • 5Tsirimpa Athena. Modeling the impact of advanced traveler information systems on travelersr behavior:puget sound region case study[R]. European Trans- port and contributor, 2005.
  • 6Khattak A J, Schofer J L, Koppelman F S. Effect of traffic reports on commuters' route and departure time changes[J]. IEEE, 1991,4: 669-679.
  • 7Khattak A J, Yim Y, Stalker L. Does travel infor- mation influence commuter and non-commuter be- havior? results from the san francisco bay area tra- vInfo project[J]. Transportation Research Record 1999, 1694(63) :48-58.
  • 8Srinivasan. Dynamics in departure time choices of commuters: a comparison of alternative adjustment mechanisms[R]. Transportation Research Board, 2001.
  • 9Jou R C. Modeling the impact of pre-trip informa- tion on commuter departure time and route choice [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2001, 35(10) : 887-902.
  • 10Khattak A J, Kanafani A, E Le Colletter. Stated and reported route diversion behavior: implications of benefits of advanced traveler information systems[R]. Transportation Research Record 1994, 1464 (0361) :28-35.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部