期刊文献+

青年男性ST段抬高急性心肌梗塞的特点及院内转归 被引量:3

Clinical Manifestations of Young Male Adults with ST Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨青年男性ST段抬高急性心肌梗塞(AMI)患者的危险因素、冠脉造影特点、临床特点及院内转归。方法对年龄≤44岁的青年男性AMI患者(61例,青年组)与同期同病同性别年龄≥65岁、<75岁(老年组)的AMI患者(61例)就其危险因素、冠脉造影、临床特点及院内转归进行对比分析。结果冠心病危险因素青年组高血压、糖尿病明显少于中年组;吸烟青年组高于老年组,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、阳性家族史两组无明显差别;冠脉造影青年组单支病变多,累及回旋支(LCX)多,右冠状动脉(RCA)少;老年组双支及双支以上病变多,多累及LCX,RCA。与老年组相比,青年组住院天数、心肌酶、机械并发症及死亡构成差别无统计学意义。结论年轻心梗患者大量吸烟者多,单支病变多,有糖尿病、高血压病史者少,但年轻心梗患者院内转归与老年组相似。 Objective To compare and analyze risk factors and coronary angiography of young and older male adults with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Method During hospitalization period, 61 cases of an initial ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction(AMI) who were admitted to our hospital and who were under or 44 years of age (young group) were compared to 61 patients who were over or 65 but under 75 admitted during the same time for same reason (older group). Result Young group had fewer patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and more have smoking habit, and had a higher prevalence of single-vessel disease and a higher incidence of left circumflex coronary artery and a lower incidence of right circumflex coronary artery. The length of hospitalization, maxCKMB, major complications and death in young group showed no differences from those of the older group. Conclusion Young group had more cigarette consumption, more single-vessel lesion. In-hospital outcome in young male ST-elevated AMI is comparable to that of older-age group.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2008年第12期1245-1247,共3页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
关键词 急性心肌梗塞 冠脉造影 危险因素 男性 青年 预后 acute myocardial infarction coronary angiography risk factors male young adults prognosis
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Foumier JA, Sanchez A, Quero J, et al. Myocardial infarction in men aged 40 years or less: A prospective clinical angiographic study [J]. Clin Cardiol, 1996, 19(8):631-636.
  • 2Garoufalis S, Kouvaras G, Vitsias G, et al. Comparison of angiographic findings, risk factors, and long-term follow-up between young and old patients with a history of myocardial infarction [J]. Int J Cardiol, 1998,67(1 ) :75-80.
  • 3Choudhury L, Marsh JD. Myocardial infarction in young patients [J]. Am J Med, 1999,107(3) :254-261.
  • 4Shiaishi J, Kohno Y, Yamaguchi S, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in young Japanese adults: Clinical manifestations and in-hospital outcome [J]. Circ J, 2005,69(12):1454-1458.
  • 5Herlitz J, Karlson BW, Bang A, et al. Survival, mode of death, reinfarction and use of medication in different age groups [J]. Cardiology, 1996,87(6) :529-536.
  • 6Goldberg R J, Gore JM, Gurwitz JH, et al. The impact of age on the incidence and prognosis of initial acute myocardial infarction: The Worcester heart attack study [J]. Am Heart J, 1989,117(3) :543-549.
  • 7Marcus FI, Fridy K, McCans J, et al. Age-related prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (the muhicenter dihiazem postinfarction trial) [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 1990,65 (9) : 559 - 566.
  • 8Fournier JA, Cabezon S, Cayuela A, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients having acute myocardial infarction when ≤40 years of age [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2004,94(8):989- 992.
  • 9Beohar N, Davidson C J, Weigold G, et al. Predictors of long-term outcome following direct percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2001,88(10) : 1103-1107.
  • 10Shiraishi J, Kohno Y, Yamaguchi S, et al. Medium-term prognosis of young Japanese adults having acute myocardial infarction [J]. Circ J, 2006,70(5) :518-524.

同被引文献33

  • 1吴京兰,苏又苏,方鸿城,付剑云,王晓艳,王执兵,罗国庆,盛国太.年轻急性心肌梗塞患者临床及冠脉造影特征[J].中国误诊学杂志,2004,4(12):1969-1971. 被引量:3
  • 2中国心脏调查组,胡大一,潘长玉.中国住院冠心病患者糖代谢异常研究——中国心脏调查[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2006,22(1):7-10. 被引量:471
  • 3王立军,江时森,宫剑滨,张起高,彭永平,何松清,汪春辉,林欣.中、青年男性急性心肌梗塞患者危险因素及冠脉造影的比较分析[J].中国现代医药杂志,2006,8(7):1-3. 被引量:7
  • 4Garoufalis S, Kouvaras G, Vitsias G, et al. Comparison of angiographic findings, risk factors, and long term follow-up between young and old patients with a history of myocardial infarction [J]. Int J Cardiol, 1998,67( 1 ) :75-80.
  • 5Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, et al. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values [J]. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31 (8) : 1473-1478.
  • 6Migliaresi P, Celentano A, Palmieri V, et al. Knowledge of cardiovascularrisk factors and awareness of non-phammcological approach for risk prevention in young survivors of acute myocardial infarction.The cardiovascular risk prevention project "Help Your Heart stay Young" [Jl. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2007,17(6) :468-472.
  • 7Timmer JR, Hoekstra M, Nijsten MW, et al. Prognostic value of admission glycosylated hemoglobin and glucose in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treatedwith percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Circulation, 2011, 124(6) :704-711.
  • 8Kmet M, Rajer B, Pernat A. Hemoglobin Alc is better predictor of prognosis following the non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome than fasting and admission glucose [J3. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2013,12(3) :0468-2.
  • 9Selvin E, Coresh J, Golden SH, et al. Glycemic control and coronary heart disease risk in persons with and without diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2005, 165(16) : 1910-1916.
  • 10Santos-Oliveira R, Purdy C, da Silva MP, et al. Haemoglobin A lc levels and subsequent cardiovascular disease in persons without diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohorts [J]. Diabetologia, 2011,54 (6) : 1327-1334.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

;
使用帮助 返回顶部