期刊文献+

“低价揽业”与审计市场的价格竞争 被引量:10

"Low Balling" and Price Competition in Audit Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用2001—2005年A股审计市场的面板数据,对审计市场的"低价揽业"行为进行实证检验。结果表明,在审计师更换当年,会计师事务所对客户给予了明显的价格优惠。进一步的分析发现,这种价格折扣主要发生在相同质量等级的事务所间的审计更换。因此,在消除审计质量差异的情况下,我国A股证券审计市场出现了普遍的"低价揽客"行为。然而,与美国审计市场出现的25%的初始价格折扣相比,我国的初始价格折扣更低。这意味着在审计费披露更为透明的市场上,"低价揽业"行为会受到有效抑制。因此,加强审计费披露机制可以作为政府直接干预的替代机制,对审计市场的价格竞争进行更有效的监管。 We empirically test the "low bailing" behavior of audit market with the panel data of Chinese audit market during 2001 - 2005. Results indicate a significant price cutting in the initial engagement year. Further study shows that price cutting was mainly found in the auditor switch between accounting firms providing the same audit quality. Therefore, Chinese audit market has indeed universal low bailing behavior. However, the level of the price cutting in Chinese audit market is lower than that in Amercian audit market. Therefore the mechanism of publicizing audit fee will be an effective substitute of government intervene mechanism to regulate price competition in the audit market.
作者 李眺
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期132-140,共9页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目"审计质量的保障机制研究:一个产业组织的视角"(项目批准号:70503018)的阶段性成果
关键词 低价揽业 价格折扣 审计师更换 low bailing price cutting auditor switch
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1韩洪灵,陈汉文.中国上市公司初始审计的定价折扣考察——来自审计师变更的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007(9):83-89. 被引量:41
  • 2李连军.事务所声誉与审计定价研究[D].上海财经大学博士学位论文,2004.
  • 3李眺.2007.声誉还是市场势力[R].上海财经大学工作论文.
  • 4刘斌,叶建中,廖莹毅.我国上市公司审计收费影响因素的实证研究——深沪市2001年报的经验证据[J].审计研究,2003(1):44-47. 被引量:258
  • 5伍德里奇.计量经济学导论:现代观点[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
  • 6BABER W, BROOKS E,RICK W. 1987. An empirical investigation of the market for audit services in the public sector[ J]. Journal of Accounting Research ,25:293 - 305.
  • 7CRASWELL A, FRANCIS J. 1999. Pricing initial audit engagements : a test of competing theories[ J ]. The Accounting Review, (April) :201 -216.
  • 8CRASWELL A, FRANCIS J,TAYLOR S. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics ,3 (December) :297 - 322.
  • 9LEE J, GU Z Y. 1998. Low bailing, legal liability and auditor independence[J]. The Accounting Review ,73 (October) : 533 -555.
  • 10DEANGELO L E. 1981. Auditor independence ,"low bailing" and disclosure regulations[ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2 (August) :113 - 127.

二级参考文献22

  • 1张立民,管劲松.我国A股审计市场的结构研究——来自2002上市公司年度报告的数据[J].审计研究,2004(5):31-36. 被引量:48
  • 2Ananth Seetharaman, Ferdinand A. Gul, Stephen G. lynn. Litigation risk and fees:evidence from UK firms cross listed on US markets[J ]Journal of Accounting and economics,2002, Vol. 36 91 - 115.
  • 3Kenton B. Walker and Eric N. Johson. 1996. A review and Synthesis of Research on Supplier Concentration, Quality and Fee Structure in Non- U. S. Markets for Auditor Services [ J ] The International Journal of Accounting,Vol. 31, No. 1: 1- 18.
  • 4Mark H. Taylor and Danniel T. Simon. 1999. Determinants of Audit Fees: The Importance of Litigation, Disclosure, and Regulatory Burdens in Audit Engagements in 20 Countr[J]The International Journed of Accounting,Vol. 34,No.3,375-388.
  • 5Neil Fargher, Mark H. Taylor and Danniel T. Simon. 2001.The demand for reputation across international markets for audit services[J ]The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 36 No. 1,407- 421.
  • 6Vivien Beattie, Alan Goodacre, Ken Pratt and Joanna Stevenson. 2000. The determinants of Audit Fees- Evidence from the Voluntary Sector, 10,1 - 41.
  • 7孙铮,李增泉.2000.中国与会计透视[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社
  • 8李树华.审计独立性的提高与审计市场的背离.上海:上海三联书店.1999.
  • 9Casterella et al. 2004. Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23 : 123 - 140
  • 10Chi-wen Jevons Lee and Zhaoyang Gu. 1998. Low Bailing, Legal Liability and Auditor Independence. The Accounting Review, Vol. 73:533-555.

共引文献298

同被引文献117

引证文献10

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部