摘要
目的观察比较α稳态法和pH稳态法测定体外循环中低温和复温时的血气结果,评价α稳态法应用于体外循环中的意义。方法随机选择7例先天性心脏病(室间隔缺损或房间隔缺损)患者,分别于术前、低温28℃时、复温至31℃和36℃时采取动静脉血样,采用α稳态法和pH稳态法进行血气分析。结果在低温28℃和31℃时用α稳态法处理的动静脉血样本与pH稳态法处理的样本结果有显著性差别,表现酸血症和高碳酸血症。结论低温体外循环中α稳态法可以反映出低温和复温时的酸血症和高碳酸血症,维持α稳态更有利于大脑灌注的调节。
Objective To compare the values of αstat with pHstat strategy used in hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods Seven patients undergoing cardic surgery were studied. Both arterial and venous blood samples were analyzed for bloodgas at preoperation, hypothermic 28℃, rewarming 31℃, 36℃. Respectively by αstat and pHstat. Results PCO2 in the αstat strategy was significantly higher than that in the pHstat strategy at 28℃, rewarming 31℃, respectively, which were hypercarbia. In the αstat strategy, pH was significantly different from that in the pHstat strategy during hypothermia and rewarming (P<005, respectively). Conclusion αstat strategy is more appropriate to acidbase of management during hypothermic CPB.
出处
《安徽医科大学学报》
CAS
1998年第1期33-34,共2页
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
关键词
体外循环
血气分析
α稳态法
eSH extracorporeal circulation
blood gas analysis
hypercapnia