期刊文献+

互叶白千层对冷害的生理响应 被引量:5

Physiological Response of Melaleuca leucadendron to Cold Damage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]研究互叶白千层对冷害的抗性机理。[方法]以互叶白千层为试材,取中部叶片,测定冷害前后互叶白千层的电导率、过氧化物酶和硝酸还原酶活性以及丙二醛含量。[结果]互叶白千层具有较强的抵抗低温的能力。低温处理后,不同月份互叶白千层的电导率表现出明显的变化。12月份和4月份的冷害对互叶白千层的伤害最大,3月份最小,1月份和2月份相差不大。互叶白千层的POD活性呈现逐渐降低的趋势,12月份最高,3月份最低。3月份丙二醛含量最高,12、4月份较高,1月份最低。121、月份互叶白千层的NR活性最高,3月份最低,4月份有所回升,但幅度不大。[结论]互叶白千层具有较强的抵御长时间低温冷害的能力。 [Objective] The study was to research the resistance mechanism of Melaleuca leucodendron to cold damage. [Method] With M.leucadendron as the tested material, its middle leaves were taken to detect the conductivity, the activities of POD and NR and content of MDA of M. leucadendron pre and post of cold damage. [Result] M. leucadendron had a strong resistance to low temperature.Mter treatment at low temperature,the conductivity of M. leucadendron in different months showed an obvious change. The damage of cold damage in December and April on M. leacadendron was the biggest and that in March was the least,and that in January and February had little difference.The POD activity of M. leucadendron showed a trend of gradually decreasing,and the POD activity in December was the highest and that in Marcia was the lowest. The MDA content in M. leucadendron was the highest in March,and that was higher in December and April and that was the lowest in January.The NR activity of M. leacadendron was the highest in December and January, and that was the lowest in March and had a little upttma in April. [ Conclusion] M. leucadendron had stronger resistance to low temperature damage with long time.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第33期14399-14400,14405,共3页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 广西自然基金项目(桂科自0832099) 广西教育厅项目(GJKY2008041) 玉林师范学院青年基金项目(200703)
关键词 互叶白千层 冷害 生理响应 Melaleuca leucadendron Cold damage Physiological response
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1余涛,支立峰,彭论,李阳生,朱英国.烟草中一条新的S-腺苷甲硫氨酸合成酶基因的克隆及表达分析[J].武汉植物学研究,2004,22(4):277-283. 被引量:24
  • 2岳昌武,何博文,何明雄,张义正.甘薯S-腺苷甲硫氨酸合成酶基因克隆与表达[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(6):121-125. 被引量:10
  • 3李浚明.植物组织培养教程[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1977..
  • 4J. J. Brophy, N. W. Davies, L. A. Southwell et al. Gas Chromatographic Quality Control for Oil of Melaleuca Terpinen-4-ol Type[J]. Journal of Agriculture & Food Chemistry, 1989,37 (5):1330 - 1335.
  • 5C. F. Carson,T. V. Riley. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1993,16(2):49 -55.
  • 6K. A. Hammer, C. F. Carson, T. V. Riley, Antifungal activity of the components of Melaleuca alternifolia(tea tree) oil[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology ,95 (4) :853 - 860.
  • 7C. F. Carson,T. V. Riley. Susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes to the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia [J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1994,19(1):24 - 25.
  • 8]A. Raman, U. Weir, S. F. Bloomfield, Antimicrobial effects of tea-tree oil and its major components on Staphylococcus aureus,Staph. epidermidis and Propionibacterium acnes[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1995,21 (4) :242 - 245.
  • 9I. A. Southwell,A. J. Hayes,J. Markham et al. THE SEARCH FOR OPTIMALLY BIOACTIVE AUSTRALIAN TEA TREE OIL[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 1993, (344):256 - 265.
  • 10C. M. Mann, J. L. Markham,A new method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of essential oils[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1998,84 (4):538 - 544.

共引文献104

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部