期刊文献+

面向动态风险评价及投资决策的IRRV模型 被引量:5

An IRRV Model for Dynamic Risk Evaluation and Investment Decision-Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了跨期相对风险-价值(Inter-temporal Relative Risk-Value,简称IRRV)模型,首次整合了时间-概率权衡与风险-价值权衡。面向结果非负的复杂风险事件,在偏好公理的基础上推导出时间-概率权衡关系的显性表达式,将时间具有内在不确定性这一植根于"心理距离"的直觉思想形式化,最终用关于时间的内在折扣率刻画跨期对决策者效用的影响。内在折扣率取决于决策者的时间偏好,也可能依赖结果的量值,是决定时间-概率权衡的核心因素。借助时间-概率权衡理论,将静态意义上的相对风险-价值模型扩展成为动态意义上的跨期相对风险-价值模型。该模型在同一个空间内综合考虑了价值、时间和概率三个基本的决策维度,为动态风险决策提供了一个规范化框架。 An Inter-Temporal Relative Risk-Value(IRRV) model, integrating time-probability tradeoff and risk-value tradeoff, is proposed. For complex risky events with nonnegative outcomes, an explicit formula of time-probability tradeoff is derived based on some preference axioms, which formalizes the "psychological distance" -based intuition that the time is intrinsically uncertain and the inter-temporal effect on utility is captured by an intrinsic time discount rate. This intrinsic discount rate, serving as a core factor of time- probability tradeoff, is mainly determined by decision-maker's time preference and probably depends on the magnitude of outcomes. Based on the time-probability tradeoff, this paper extends the static relative risk-value model to a dynamic IRRV model. This model synthesizes three fundamental decision-making dimensions, namely value, time and probability under a common state space and provides a normative framework for dynamic risk evaluation and investment decision.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2008年第6期1-8,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(70825006) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70471030)
关键词 时间-概率权衡 风险-价值权衡 内在折扣率 跨期相对风险-价值模型 time-probability tradeoff risk-value tradeoff intrinsic discount rate inter-temporal relative risk-value model
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Raiffa, H. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty[M]. Random House, New York, 1968.
  • 2Manel Baucells& Franz H. Heukamp. Probability and Time Tradeoff[Z]. SSRN working paper, http://ssrn. com/abstract= 970570, 2008.
  • 3Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. The Theory of Games and Economics Behavior [M]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 4Koopmans, Tjalling C. Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience[J]. Econometrica, 1960, 28: 287-309.
  • 5Rotter, J. B. Social learning and clinical psychology [M]. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1954.
  • 6Mischel, W. , and J. Grusec. Waiting for rewards and punishments: Effects of time and probability in choice[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5: 24--31.
  • 7Rachlin, H. , and E. Siegel. Temporal Patterning In Probabilistie Choice[J]. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 1994, 59(2):161--176.
  • 8Stevenson, M. K. The Impact of Temporal Context and Risk on the Judged Value of Future Outcomes[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992, 52:455.
  • 9Ahlbrecht, Martin, and Martin Weber. An Empirical Study on Intertemporal Decision Making Under Risk [J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(6): 813.
  • 10Halevy, Y. Strotz meets Allais.. Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect[J]. American Economic Review, 2008, 3(98): 1145--1162.

同被引文献95

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部