期刊文献+

国际财产征收中的若干法律问题 被引量:1

Some Legal Issues in International Expropriation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 资本输入国可以根据社会公共利益的需要实行国有化或财产征收。关于国际财产征收,发达国家以及发展中国家之间存在着极大的分歧。其中涉及到了征收的条件、补偿的标准、征收的域外效力以及国外法院的承认和执行。随着国际投资争端案件和仲裁裁决的增多,投资保护协定对于投资者和接受投资国都显得日益重要。对于财产征收问题,各国的投资法律和实践都不尽相同,本文结合欧美等国在投资保护问题上的看法,以及通过分析相关案件来阐述在国际投资中如何平衡资本输出国和输入国之间的利益。 Host countries might undertake expropriation measures against investors in consideration of public interest. However, guest countries and host countries hold expropriation with respects to conditions, scope and compensation, enforcement of expropriation. With the increasing number of cases, different attitudes towards as well as recognition and bilateral investment treaties become more and more important for investors and guest countries. This article endeavors to analyze how to balance the interest of the relevant parties in international investment with special reference on the disputes arising from investment among western countries and development countries.
作者 江清云
出处 《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第6期93-100,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金 同济大学促进对德学术交流中心资助项目(项目编号:0700219090)
关键词 国际投资保护 征收 管辖 补偿标准 域外效力 international investment protection expropriation jurisdiction compensation criteria extraterritorial effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1[2]http://WWW.urictad.org/Templates/Pagep.asp?intlteim ID=2344 & lang=1.
  • 2[2][6]Lowenfeld A.F,(2002),International Economic Law,Oxford,Oxford University Press,P.474、476.
  • 3[4]Schreuer C.H.(2005),Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice,The Journal of World Investment and.Trade 6,(3).P.357.
  • 4[7]R.Dolzer and M.Stevens(1995),Bilateral Investment Treaties,the Hague,Kluwer Law International,1995,P.61.
  • 5[8]Paulson,J.(1995),"Arbitration Without Privity."ICSID Review:foreign investment law journal 10,(2):232-257.
  • 6[9]Sornarjah M.(2004),The International Law on Foreign Investment.Cambridge,Cambridge University Press,第253页及后续内容.
  • 7[2]Lowenfeld A.F.(2002),International Economic Law,Oxford,Oxford University Press,p.486.
  • 8[3]参见:Guzman A.(1998),"Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them:Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral In-vestment Treaties."Virginia Journal of International Law 38,第686页及后续内容.
  • 9[1]伊朗-美国特别索赔法庭:Starrett Housing Corp.v.IslamicRepublic of Iran,Iran-U.P.C.T.R.4(1983III),P.122(154).
  • 10[4](International LegaI Materials)ILM i4(2005),P.268ff(国际法资料).

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部