摘要
资本输入国可以根据社会公共利益的需要实行国有化或财产征收。关于国际财产征收,发达国家以及发展中国家之间存在着极大的分歧。其中涉及到了征收的条件、补偿的标准、征收的域外效力以及国外法院的承认和执行。随着国际投资争端案件和仲裁裁决的增多,投资保护协定对于投资者和接受投资国都显得日益重要。对于财产征收问题,各国的投资法律和实践都不尽相同,本文结合欧美等国在投资保护问题上的看法,以及通过分析相关案件来阐述在国际投资中如何平衡资本输出国和输入国之间的利益。
Host countries might undertake expropriation measures against investors in consideration of public interest. However, guest countries and host countries hold expropriation with respects to conditions, scope and compensation, enforcement of expropriation. With the increasing number of cases, different attitudes towards as well as recognition and bilateral investment treaties become more and more important for investors and guest countries. This article endeavors to analyze how to balance the interest of the relevant parties in international investment with special reference on the disputes arising from investment among western countries and development countries.
出处
《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2008年第6期93-100,共8页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金
同济大学促进对德学术交流中心资助项目(项目编号:0700219090)
关键词
国际投资保护
征收
管辖
补偿标准
域外效力
international investment protection
expropriation
jurisdiction
compensation criteria
extraterritorial effect