期刊文献+

系统理论指导下辩证思维模式与抗休克决策 被引量:1

The Mode of Dialectical Thinking and Antishock Clinical Decision under Instruction of System Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 休克是由于有效循环血量不足引发的微循环障碍而表现一系列症候群,作为一种系统性疾病,病因十分复杂多样,诊疗过程中的临床决策应全面而富有针对性,并充分考虑到救治措施的协调一致和互相配合。系统论主张整体大于部分之和强调的就是措施之间的整体化效果,充分考虑到患者个体间差异,辩证分析不同类型休克、不同个体间不同表现,在系统理论指导下的富有针对性措施间协调一致的决策模式才是较为完整的休克救治临床决策模式。 Shock is a systemic disease of a series of syndrome initiated by microcirculation disturbance because of effective circulation volume oligemia. Its complex etiopathogenisis request overall and direct clinical decision in its diagnosis and treatment. It is very important to allow for coordination of remedy. The systemic theory which stands for that entirety exceeds hamony of all parts, emphasizes the entire effect between measures. It is necessary to have in mind interindividual variation thoroughly and dialectical analysis on different type of shock and distinct appearance of different individual in treatment of shock. It is integrity mode of clinical decision of treatment of shock that stresses concordance mode between directed measures under instruction of systemic theory.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2008年第12期2589-2591,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 休克 临床决策 系统论 辩证思维 Shock Clinical decision System theory Dialectical thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Qiu Yan, Qiu Liang, Li Jiang. Enlightenment of the system approach for thinking of pathologic diagnosis of boundary pathological changes[JJ. J of medical science and philosophy, 2006, 27(12):65-66.
  • 2Xue Lian, Yin Qiu-xia, Yang Xiao-ming; The systemic viewpoint of tumorigenesis and gene therapy [J]. J of Chinese clinical medicine, 2006, 7(9):46-48.
  • 3Zhang He-long. Individual combined therapy of tumour to be guided by the system theory [J]. J of medical science and philosophy, 2006, 27(1):15-17.
  • 4Fu En-qing, 3in Fa-guang, Chu Dong-ling. Clinical decision and "Limit" of evolutionary of diseases [J]. J of medical science and philosophy, 2006, 27(6): 1-2.
  • 5Fan Dai-ming. Study and research of clinical decision wait for strengthening [J]. J of medical science and philosophy, 2005, 26(12): 299-300.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部