紧急避险疑难问题研究

A Study on the Knotty problems of Urgent Act of Rescue

刑法明确了紧急避险是一种正当化事由,因而第三人无法对紧急避险人实施正当防卫,但第三人如何应对己身的合法利益损害需要探讨。对于无行为能力人制造的危险,相对人应采取紧急避险、正当防卫、还是其他举措来避免危险依赖于对无行为能力人行为属性的认定。紧急避险中的危险在特定情形下来源于避险人自招,面对自招的危险,避险人能否实施紧急避险需要区别过失与故意两种不同罪过。

Criminal Law makes it clear that urgent act of rescue is a legitimate ground, therefore, the third party can not implement justifiable defense against the urgent escaper of danger. However, how the third party deals with the damages to his legal interests needs to be thoroughly discussed. The danger arising from urgent act of rescue comes from the escaper himself in special circumstances. As to the self-induced danger, weather the escaper can implement the urgent act of rescue needs to be clarified as negligent crime or intentional crime