期刊文献+

态度改变理论的新进展:联想和命题过程评价模型 被引量:2

Advance in Theories of Attitude Change:Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在探讨态度改变的理论发展的基础上介绍态度研究的新进展——联想和命题过程评价模型,该模型认为理解态度的评价判断应该根据其潜在的心理过程:联想过程和命题过程,二者分别对应内隐和外显态度,并相互影响。同时,该模型还对态度改变进行了新的诠释。因此,该模型对于今后的态度研究具有一定的理论意义,文章最后还指出了该模型的不足之处。 The present article discusses the development in theories of attitude change, and then introduces the Associative-Propositional Evaluation Model (APE Model)provided by Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)about the attitude change. The model argued that evaluative responses should be understood in terms of their underlying mental processes: associative and propositional processes, which are related to implicit and explicit attitude respectively. Furthermore, it puts forward some implications to the future research.
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2008年第6期54-59,142,共7页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
基金 华东师范大学优秀博士研究生培养基金(20080015)
关键词 态度改变 说服模型 联想过程 命题过程 attitude change models of persuasion, associative process propositional process
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1PETTYR E, BRINOL P. A metacognitive approach to "Implicit" and "Explicit" evaluations: comment on gawronski and bodenhausen[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2006, 132 ( 5 ) : 740 - 744.
  • 2CRANO W D, PRISLIN R. Attitudes and persuasion[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2006, 57:345 - 374.
  • 3JOHNSON B T, MAIO G R, SMITH MCLALLEN A. Communication and attitude change: causes, processes, and effects[M]//ALBARRACiN D, JOHNSON B T, ZANNA M P. Handbook of attitudes and attitude change. Mahwah. N J: Erlbaum, 2005: 617- 669.
  • 4PETTY R E, CACIOPPO J T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion[M]//BERKOWITZ L. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1986:123 - 205.
  • 5CHAIKEN S, LIBERMAN A, EAGLY A H. Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context [M]// ULEMAN J S, BARGH J A. Unintended thought. New York: Guilford Press, 1989:212 - 252.
  • 6KRUGLANSKI A W, THOMPSON E P. Persuasion by a single route: a view from the unimodel[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 1999, 10(2) : 83-109.
  • 7GAWRONSKI B, STRACK F. On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40 ( 4 ) : 535- 542.
  • 8OLSON M A, FAZIO R H. Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2006, 32 ( 4 ) : 421 - 433.
  • 9WILSON T D, LINDSEY S. SCHOOLER T Y. A model of dual attitudes[J]. Psychological Review, 2000, 107 ( 1 ) : 101 - 126.
  • 10GAWRONSKI B, BODENHAUSEN G V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change[J]. Psychological Bulletin Copyright, 2006, 132 ( 5 ) : 692 - 731.

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部