期刊文献+

心理测量理论的新进展:潜在分类模型 被引量:2

Latent Class Models: New Development of Psychological Measure Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着心理测量理论的发展,潜在分类模型越来越多地受到国外研究者的关注,它能够通过分析考生的作答过程来探讨其潜在能力倾向,改变了以总分来评判学生能力的传统评价模式。首先探讨了作为该类模型基础的规则空间模型,然后综述了近年来国外有关潜在分类模型的研究,最后对该模型的研究现状进行了评价并对未来发展进行了展望。 The essay surveys the latent class models of overseas academic concern in the development of psychological measurement theory, since the models are widely applied in judging examinees' potentials through analyzing their answering process instead of evaluating their competence on total scores. It reviews the basic RSM and recent years of overseas research on the latent class models. And it also comments on the present study involved and its outlook.
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2008年第6期60-64,共5页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金"十一五"规划课题(BBA080050) 江苏省教育科学"十一五"规划课题(D/2008/01/105)
关键词 规则空间模型 融合模型 DINA模型 NIDA模型 rule space model fusion model DINA model NIDA model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献32

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2康春花,戴海崎.采用LLTM作测量与认知结合研究的初步探讨[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):569-572. 被引量:17
  • 3余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 4[1]Mark J.Gierl. An NCME Introductional Module on Exploring the Logic of Tatsuoka's Rule-Space Model for Test Development and Analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2000:34-44
  • 5[2]Tatsuoka,K.K. Changes in Error Types Over Learning Stages. Journal of Educational Psychology,1984,76(1):120-129
  • 6[3]Menucha Birenbaum & K.K.Tatsuoka The Effect of a Scoring System Based the Algorithm Underlying the students'Response Patterns on the dimensionality of Achievement Test Data of the Problem Solving Type. Journal of Educational Measurement,1983,20(1):17-26
  • 7[4]Paul, D.Nichols, Susan, F.Chipman, Robert, L.Brennan. (ED)Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc,1995
  • 8[5]K.K.Tatsuoka. Rule Space: An Approach for Dealing with Misconceptions Based on Item Response Theory. Journal of Educational Measurement,1983,20:345-354
  • 9[6]K.K.Tatsuoka. Toward an Integration of Item Response Theory and Cognitive Error Diagnosis. In: N.Fredickson, R.L.Glaser, A.M.Lesgold,& M.G.Shafto(Eds). Diagnostic Monitoring of Skills and Knowledge Acquisition,Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1990:453-488
  • 10[7]M.M.Tatsuoka & K.K.Tatsuoka. Rule Space. In: S.Kotz & N.L.Johnson(Eds.).Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences.New York:Wlley, 1989:217-220

共引文献93

同被引文献12

  • 1de la Torre J. DINA model and parameter estimation:A didactic[J].{H}JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS,2009.115-130.
  • 2Junker B W,Sijtsma K. Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions,and connections with nonparametric item response the-ory[J].{H}Applied Psychological Measturement,2001,(03):258-272.
  • 3de la Torre, J,Douglas, J. Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis[J].{H}PSYCHOMETRIKA,2004,(03):333-339.
  • 4de la Torre J,Douglas J. Model evaluation and multiple strate-gies in cognitive diagnosis:An analysis of fraction subtraction data[J].{H}PSYCHOMETRIKA,2008,(04):595-601.
  • 5de la Torre J. The generalized DINA model framework[J].Psy-chometrika,2011,(02):179-183.
  • 6de la Torre J. A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitively-based multiple-choice options[J].{H}Applied Psychological Measturement,2009.163-183.
  • 7Rupp A,Templin J. The effects of q-matrix misspecification on parameter Estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model[J].{H}EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT,2008,(01):78-96.
  • 8de la Torre, J,Lee. A note on the invariance of DINA model pa-rameters[J].Journal of Measurements,2010.115-127.
  • 9Cheng Y,Chang H. When cognitive diagnosis meets computer-ized adaptive testing:CD-CAT[J].{H}PSYCHOMETRIKA,2009,(04):619-632.
  • 10涂冬波,蔡艳,戴海崎,漆书青.现代测量理论下四大认知诊断模型述评[J].心理学探新,2008,28(2):64-68. 被引量:20

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部