法律逻辑视阈下的“禁止”和“允许”

On "Prohibition" and "Permission" in Legal Logic

从法律逻辑学的角度来看,"‘不禁止p’等于‘允许p’"不能证明"不禁止的即等于允许的"。"不禁止的即等于允许的"涉及的是全部行为(p和非p),而"‘不禁止p’等于‘允许p’"只涉及部分行为(p),非p中存在法律没有规定的行为,这部分行为必然不是法律禁止的,但也不能逻辑地推出就是法律允许的。

Beheld from the angle of legal logic, that ＂ ＇ not prohibiting p＇ is equal to ＇ permitting p＇ ＂ can＇ t prove ＂non-prohibition equals permission＂. ＂Non-prohibition equals permission＂ relates to the whole behavior （p and non-p）, but ＂ ＇ not prohibiting p＇ is equal to ＇ permitting p＇ ＂only relates to part of the behavior （p）. There exists behavior not legally prescripted in non-p, and this part of behavior must not be forbidden by law, neither can it be logically deduced permitted by law.