期刊文献+

多伦多临床评分系统在糖尿病周围神经病变中的应用价值 被引量:117

Toronto clinical scoring system in diabetic peripheral neuropathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价多伦多临床评分系统(Toronto clinical scoring system,TCSS)及其神经病变分级在糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)中的应用价值,探讨TCSS神经病变分级与糖尿病肾病、糖尿病视网膜病变分期之间的关系。方法:对209例2型糖尿病患者均进行TCSS检查,以神经电生理检查作为诊断DPN的金标准,与TCSS≥6分的结果进行比较,确定在该人群中TCSS诊断DPN的合适截断点。结果:TCSS≥6分的诊断正确率、灵敏度、特异度分别为76.6%,77.2%,75.6%,对应的约登指数及Kappa值分别为0.53及0.52,提示TCSS≥6分与神经电生理检查的一致性较好;TCSS神经病变分级与糖尿病肾病、糖尿病视网膜病变的分期呈线性正相关(P<0.05);该评分合适的截断点为5分或6分。结论:TCSS对DPN的诊断价值较高,其神经病变分级有临床应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the application value of Toronto clinical scoring system ( TCSS ) and its grading of neuropathy for diabetic peripheral neuropathy ( DPN ) , and to explore the relationship between TCSS grading of neuropathy and the grading of diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy. Methods A total of 209 patients of Type 2 diabtes ( T2DM ) underwent TCSS. Taking electrophysiological examination as a gold standard for diagnosing DPN, We compared the results of TCSS score ≥ 6 with electrophysiological examination, and tried to select the optimal cut-off points of TCSS. Results The corresponding accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of TCSS score ≥6 were 76.6% , 77.2% , and 75.6% , respectively. The Youden index and Kappa were 0.53 and 0.52,which implied TCSS score ≥ 6 had a moderate consistency with electrophysiological examination. There was a linear positive correlation between TCSS grading of neuropathy and the grading of diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy ( P 〈 0.05 ). The optimal cut-off point was 5 or 6 among these patients. Conclusion TCSS is reliable in diagnosing DPN and its grading of neuropathy has clinical value.
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期1137-1141,共5页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基金 湖南省科技厅计划项目(06J71035)~~
关键词 糖尿病神经病变 诊断试验 糖尿病视网膜病变 糖尿病肾病 diabetic neuropathy diagnostic test diabetic retinopathy diabetic nephropathy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Perkins B A, Bril V, Olaleye D, et al. Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24(2):250-256.
  • 2Bril V, Perkins B A. Validation of the Toronto clinical scotinS system for diabetic polyneuropathy [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2002, 25(11) :2048-2052.
  • 3Fabian W, Majkowska L, Stefanski A, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, antidiabetic treatment and chronic diabetic complications reported by the general practitioners [ J ]. Przegl Lek, 2005,62(4) :201-205.
  • 4Janghorbani M, Rezvanian H, Kachooei A, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Isfahan, Iran: prevalence and risk facwrs [ J ]. Acta Neurel Scand, 2006,114(6) :384-391.
  • 5Bouhon A J, Vinik A I, Arezzo J C, et al. A statement by the Amecican diabetes association: Diabetic neuropathies [J]. Diabetes Care, 2005, 28(4) :956-962.
  • 6侯瑞芳,汤正义,张炜,凌丹芸,吴景程,张连珍,毛羽丰,王卫庆,李小英,宁光.糖尿病周围神经病变多种筛查方法诊断效率的比较[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2008,16(2):91-94. 被引量:57
  • 7Dyck P J, Davies J L, Wilson D M, et al. Risk factors for severity of diabetic polyneuropathy : intensive longitudinal assessment of the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort [J]. Diabetes Care, 1999,22(9) :1479-1486.
  • 8Brownlec M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications. A unifying mechanism [ J ]. Diabetes, 2005, 54 ( 6 ) : 1615-1625.
  • 9Davies M, Brophy S, Williams R, et al. The prevalence, severity, and impact of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Type 2 diabetes [ J ] . Diabetes Care, 2006, 29 ( 7 ) : 1518-1522.

二级参考文献11

  • 1任婷婷,郭晓蕙.定量感觉检查在糖尿病周围神经病变诊断中的应用价值[J].中华糖尿病杂志(1006-6187),2005,13(5):357-359. 被引量:19
  • 2Bril V, Perkins BA. Validation of the Toronto clinical scoring system for diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care, 2000, 25: 2048-2052.
  • 3Feldman EL, Stevens MJ, Thomas PK, et al. A practical twostep quantitative clinical and electrophysiological assessment for the diagnosis and staging of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care, 1994, 17 : 1281-1289.
  • 4Meijer JWG, Smit AJ,Sonderen E, et al. Symptom scoring systems to diagnose distal polyneuropathy in diabetes: the Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom score. Diabet Med, 2002, 19:962-965.
  • 5Perkins BA, Olaleye D, Zinman B, et al. Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24: 250- 256.
  • 6Rahman M , Griffin SJ, Rathmann W, et al. How should peripheral neuropathy be assessed in people with diabetes in primary care? A population-based comparison of four measures. Diabetic Medicine, 2003, 20: 368-374.
  • 7Ziegler D, Siekierka KE, Meyer B, et al. Validation of a novel screening device (NeuroQuick) for quantitative assessment of small nerve fiber dysfunction as an early feature of diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care,2005, 28 : 1169-1174.
  • 8Jirkovska A, Boucoe ek P, Woskova V, et al. Identification of patients at risk for diabetic foot A comparison of standardized noninvasive testing with routine practice at community diabetes clinics. J Diabetes Complications, 2001,15:63-68.
  • 9Nozomu K, Kiminori Y, Shuhei N, et al. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening. J Diabetes Complications, 2005, 19:47- 53.
  • 10汤正义,李向利,张炜,张连珍,宁光,许曼音,陈家伦.2型糖尿病神经病变的发病情况与有关因素相关性分析[J].中华内科杂志,2003,42(12):868-869. 被引量:86

共引文献56

同被引文献867

引证文献117

二级引证文献930

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部