期刊文献+

耐用品行业市场进入与产品创新策略的博弈分析

Game Theory Analysis of Strategies of Market Entry and Product Innovation in the Industry of Durable-goods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用一个新产品古诺产量竞争的两阶段博弈模型,研究耐用品行业中在位者和潜在进入者的市场进入和产品创新策略,对企业的创新行为进行了福利分析.研究发现,在位者是否遏制进入取决于在位者和进入者的创新成本以及新产品的创新程度.产品创新可以提高在位者遏制进入的能力,新产品创新程度越大,遏制进入的好处越大、代价越低,在遏制进入时在位者越倾向于不进行产品创新.某些情况下,在位者的创新成本越大,遏制进入越困难.进入者的创新成本较小时,创新投资激励过度;较大时,创新投资激励不足;介于两者之间时,企业的选择与社会利益一致. Using a two-period game model of Cournot quantity competition between new products, this article investigated the strategies of market entry and product innovation of incumbent and entrant in the industry of durable-goods, and made a welfare appraisal of firms' innovation behaviors. It is found that whether the incumbent deters entry depends on the innovation costs of incumbent and entrant, and the innovation extent of new products. Innovation can strengthen incumbent's capability of deterrence. If the innovation extent increases, advantages of deterrence will become greater, expenses of it will decrease and incumbent is apt to not innovate when entry is deterred. In some cases, if the innovation cost of incumbent increases, deterrence will become more difficult. When the innovation cost of entrant is low, there is excessive incentive of innovation investment; when it is high, the incentive is insufficient; when it is at middle level, the interests of firms are consistent with those of social planner.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期1810-1813,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
关键词 耐用品 市场进入 产品创新 企业策略 博弈分析 durable-goods market entry product innovation corporate strategy game theory analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1United States Government Printing Office. Economic report of president 2007 [EB/OL]. (2007-02-08) [2007-03-30]. http://www. gpoaccess. gov/eop/index.html.
  • 2吴意云.网络效应与耐用网络效应产品垄断定价[J].浙江社会科学,2006(4):55-58. 被引量:2
  • 3Levinthal D A, Purohit D. Durable goods and product obsolescence [J]. Marketing Science, 1998, 8(1) : 35- 56.
  • 4Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Upgrades, tradeins, and buybacks [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1998, 29(2) : 235-258.
  • 5Waldman M. Planned obsolescence and the R&D decision[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1996, 27(3): 583-595.
  • 6Nahm J. Durable-goods monopoly with endogenous innovation[J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2004, 13(2): 303-319.
  • 7Lee I H, Lee J. A theory of economic obsolescence [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1998, 46 (3): 383-401.
  • 8Hoppe H C, Lee I H. Entry deterrence and innovation in durable-goods monopoly [J]. European Economic Review, 2003, 47(6) : 1011-1036.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Akerlof,George,1970,"The Market for ‘ Lemons’",Quarterly Journal of Economics,Vol.84,No.3,pp.488-500.
  • 2Ausubel,Lawrence and Raymond Deneckere,1989,"Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly",Econometrica Vol.57,pp.511-531.
  • 3Bagnoli,Mark; Stephen Salant and Joseph Swierzbinski,1989,"Durable -Goods Monopoly with Discrete Demand",Journal of Political Economics,Vol.97,pp.1459 -1478.
  • 4Bensaid,Bernard and Jean-Philippe Lesne,1996,"Dynamic Monopoly Pricing with Network Externalities",International Journal of Industrial Organization,Vol.14,pp.837-855.
  • 5Bulow,Jeremy I.,1982,"Durable-Goods Monopolists",Journal of Political Economics,Vol.90,No.21,pp.314-342.
  • 6Coase,R.H.,1972,"Durability and Monopoly",Journal of Law and Economics,Vol.15,No.1,pp.143 -149.
  • 7Fudenberg,Drew and Jean Tirole,1998,"Upgrades,Trade-ins,and Buybacks",Rand Journal of Economics,Vol.29,No.2,pp.235-258.
  • 8Ellison,Glenn and Drew Fudenberg,2000,"The Neo-Luddite' s Lament:Excessive Upgrades in the Software Industry",Rand Journal of Economics,Vol.31,No.2,pp.253-277.
  • 9Gul,Faruk; Hugo Sonnenschein,and Robert Wilson,1986,"Foundations of Dynamic Monopoly and theCoase Conjecture",Journal of Economic Theory,Vol.39,pp.155-190.
  • 10Katz,M.,L.and Carl Sharpiro,1985,"Network Externalities,Competition and Compatibility",American Economic Review,Vol.75,No.3,pp.424-440.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部