期刊文献+

股权分置改革后大股东与管理者合谋的博弈分析 被引量:9

Analysis on Collusive Game Between Large Shareholders and Managers after Shareholder structure Reform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股权分置改革完成后,中国上市公司的股权结构将发生重大变化,即实现股份全流通和股权分散化,特别是在上市公司实行股权激励计划后,出于和大股东相同的追求股权价值最大化的目的,管理层有可能成为虚假信息披露的直接提供者,与大股东合谋损害中小股东利益。利用核以及类Shapley值概念分析了两者合谋的根源和实现条件,结果表明:除了加强各自的收益、成本控制外,对其中一方参数(如持股比例)的控制会影响到另一方参与合谋的积极性,通过相互约束可以维护中小股东利益,从而实现上市公司的良性发展。 After share splitting reform, the ownership structure of China listed companies will change significantly. All of the shares will be tradable and the degree of ownership concentration will be lessened. Due to large number of listed companies carrying out stock and option incentive mechanism, managers will directly provide information disclosure fraud, with the same motive: i.e. pursuing for stock value maximization. Driven by the same motive, there will appear expropriation on the benefit of small and middle shareholders jointly taken by large shareholders and managers. According to the definition of core and quasi - Shapley value, this article analyzed the root and the realizable condition of collusion between large shareholders and managers. The results showed that besides strengthening the control of each return and cost, the parametric(for example, the equity ratio) control of one player's utility function may have an effect on the other' s collusive activity, and using mutual constraints to make the benefits of small and middle shareholders be ensured, so the listed companies will get a better development.
出处 《经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期55-57,共3页 On Economic Problems
基金 北京市人文社科重点项目(SZ200710009003) 北京市高校学术创新团队项目(200507035) 北京市属高校人才强校计划资助项目
关键词 股权分置改革 合作博弈 类Shapley值 share splitting reform cooperation game core quasi - Shapley value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Fan J P H, Wong T J. Corporate Ownership Structure and The Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2002,33:401 -425.
  • 2吴晓求.股权分置改革后的中国资本市场[M].北京:中国人民出版社,2006.
  • 3潘泽清,张维.大股东与经营者合谋行为及法律约束措施[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):118-122. 被引量:29
  • 4Burkart M, Fausto P, Shleifer A. Family Firms[J] .Journal of Finance,2003,58(10) :2167 - 2202.
  • 5刘长庚,龚志勇,杨东华.有效防治“内部人控制”的博弈分析[J].中国经济评论(1536-9056),2003,3(10):51-58. 被引量:4
  • 6朱晨,张道武,刘晓伟.现代股份制企业股权结构分析[J].统计与决策,2004,20(3):77-79. 被引量:1
  • 7Gillies, Donald B. Solutions to general non- zero-sum games [ M]. Princeton University Press, 1959.47 - 85.
  • 8Shapley, Lloyd S, Martin Shubik. Solutions of N- person games with ordinal utilities [J]. Econometrica, 1953, (21) :348 - 349.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Dyck A, Zingales L. Private benefits of control: An International Comparison[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004,59 (4): 537- 600.
  • 2Johnson S, LaPorta F, Lopez - de - Silanes F, Shleifer A. Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90: 22- 27.
  • 3冯果,艾传涛.控制股东的诚信义务及民事责任制度研究[M].载王保树,商事法论集,北京:法律出版社,2002.
  • 4Burkart M,Fausto P,Shleifer A.Family Firms[J].Journal of Finance,2003,58(10):2167-2202.
  • 5西崎健司,仓泽资成.股票保有构成和企业价值[R].http://www.kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp.日本银行金融市场局工作报告,2002-J-4.
  • 6Pagano M,Roell A.The choice of stock ownership structure:Agency costs,monitoring and the decision to go public [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,113:187-225.
  • 7周刚,姜彦福,雷家骕,傅家骥.战略性大股东的公司治理[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(2):76-78. 被引量:2
  • 8宁向东,冯俊新.分红和配股联动:大股东剥夺的含义[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,20(11):114-117. 被引量:12
  • 9施东晖.上市公司控制权价值的实证研究[J].经济科学,2003(6):83-89. 被引量:129

共引文献49

同被引文献122

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部