期刊文献+

不同草皮缓冲带对径流污染物的去除效果试验研究 被引量:26

Removal of Runoff Pollution by Different Grass-buffers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择上海地区常见的5种草皮植被,利用自行设计的试验装置构建草皮缓冲带,模拟上海地区农业面源污染和降雨特征,进行缓冲带污染物净化效果试验研究。结果表明,草皮的存在明显提高缓冲带对污染物的净化效果,并且能增强缓冲带土壤的渗透能力;百慕大缓冲带对径流SS的截留能力最强,平均去除率达到71.86%;草皮缓冲带对渗流水营养物质的净化效果明显高于径流,渗流水TN、TP平均去除率以白花三叶草最高,分别为58.27%和60.49%;综合考虑降雨特征和污染物净化效果等因素,百慕大、白花三叶草和高羊茅等3种草皮,可以作为上海地区缓冲带草皮植被的优先选择种类。 Five local grasses in Shanghai were selected and the designed test trays were adopted to construct buffer strips for simulation of. agriculture non-point and rainfall characteristics in Shanghai. Results showed that grass can enhance the pollutant purifying effect and penetrating power of buffer strips, with SS removal efficiency as the highest as 71.86% for buffer strip with planted Cynodon dactylon. Nutrition purifying effect of seepage was obviously higher than runoff for buffer strip, with TN and TP removal efficiency as the highest as 58.27% and 60.49% for buffer strips with planted Trifolium repens. Comprehensive consideration of purifying effect and rainfall characteristics, Cynodon dactylon, Trifolium repens and Festuca Arundinacea could be as the priority grass types for buffers in Shanghai.
出处 《环境科学与技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期109-112,共4页 Environmental Science & Technology
关键词 草皮 缓冲带 净化效果 径流 渗流 grass buffer purifying effect runoff seepage
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Mariet M Hefting, Jean-Christophe Clement, Piotr Bienkowski. The role of vegetation and litter in the nitrogen dynamics of riparian buffer zones in Europe[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005,24: 465-482.
  • 2Stephanie M Parkyn, Robert J Davies-CoUey, A Bryce Cooper. Predictions of stream nutrient and sediment yield changes following restoration of forested riparian buffers[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005,24: 551-558.
  • 3Venkatachalam Anbumozhi, Jay Radhakrishnan, Eiji Yamaji. Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality and associated management considerations[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005,24: 517-523.
  • 4Ellen Macdonalda, Carl J Burgessb, Garry J Scrimgeour. Should riparian buffers be part of forest management based on emulation of natural disturbance [J]. Forest Ecology and Management , 2004,187:185-196.
  • 5范小华,谢德体,魏朝富.河岸带生态系统管理模型研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(1):277-282. 被引量:16
  • 6Anna Lloyda, Bradley Law, Ross Goldingay. Bat activity on riparian zones and upper slopes in Australian timber production forests and the effectiveness of riparian buffers [J]. Biological Conservation,2006,129: 207-220.
  • 7国家环境保护局编.水和废水监测分析方法(第Ⅲ版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1989.
  • 8叶建锋,操家顺.生态修复技术在保护水库水源地中的应用[J].环境科学与技术,2004,27(2):61-63. 被引量:40
  • 9王晓燕,曹利平.控制农业非点源污染的排污收费理论探讨[J].环境科学与技术,2007,30(12):47-50. 被引量:15
  • 10李世锋.关于河岸缓冲带拦截泥沙和养分效果的研究[J].水土保持科技情报,2003,21(6):41-43. 被引量:38

二级参考文献69

共引文献481

同被引文献345

引证文献26

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部