期刊文献+

“合分论”引申的两条轨迹——浅谈纪录片与专题片的界定 被引量:2

Two Paths Expanded from the Theory of Integration-Disintegration:Brief Discussion about the Limits between Documentary and Special Piece
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对纪录片和专题片的分辨,学界和业界的争论由来已久。从"合分论"出发,提出界定的根本问题——"专题片是不是纪录片",并探讨有关史著、实践操作及理论探讨中对这一根本问题的回答,进而认为"合论"更多地代表着一条学术路径,而"分论"更多地代表着实践路径。在此基础上,倾向于用"合论"将"合分论"合流,即将专题片归类于纪录片。 About the discrimination between the documentary and the special piece, the argument between the academia and the field is long-standing. This article embarked from the thory of integrationdisintegration and advanced the basic question to the limit: Is the special piece a documentary? The answers given by the history literature, the practice operation and the academic papers had been discussed. The viewpoint was subsequently proposed that the integration theory was representing an academic way while the disintegration theory was representing the practice way. Depending on this foundation, this article inclined to uphold the integration theory, that is to admit the special piece is a documentary.
作者 李刚存
出处 《云南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第5期55-58,共4页 Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Social Science)
关键词 纪录片 专题片 合分论 documentary special piece the theory of integration-disintegration
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献7

共引文献32

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部