中文人生意义问卷(C-MLQ)在大学生中的适用性

Chinese Meaning in Life Questionnaire Revised in College Students and Its Reliability and Validity Test

目的:检验人生意义问卷(MLQ)在中国大学生中的适用性。方法:采用中文人生意义问卷(C-MLQ)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、Rosenberg自尊量表(SES)、自我超越生命意义量表(SMLS)、情感平衡量表(PANAS)和生活满意度量表(SWLS)对531名大学生进行测试,对问卷的信效度进行了检验。结果:①量表具有较好的内部一致性和跨时间的稳定性,体验和追寻分问卷的内部一致性α系数分别为0.85,0.82,间隔2周的重测相关系数分别为0.74和0.76,Ρ<0.01;②探索性和验证性因素分析的结果均表明中文人生意义问卷具有较好的结构效度,条目在所属因子上的因素负荷均超过0.6,验证性因素分析的拟合指标也都达到了建议值;③C-MLQ具有较好的聚合效度与区分效度。结论:中文人生意义问卷(C-MLQ)具有较好测量学性能。

Objective： The aim of the research was to test the applicability of Chinese Meaning in Life Questionnaire （C-MLQ） and its reliability and validity in college students. Methods： C-MLQ and a parcel of scales were administered to 531 college students from three universities in China. Exploratory Factor Analysis （EFA） and confirmatory factor analysis （CFA） were employed to check the construct validity. Results： Firstly, the internal consistency of the two subscales were qualified, the coefficient alpha of two subscales were 0.85 and 0.82 respectively; test-retest reliability were 0.74 and 0.76 respectively; secondly, compared with original scales, the construct of C-MLQ also had two factors, the item factor loadings ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 on the factor it belonged to. Thirdly, the correlations of C-MLQ and criterion measurement were 0.025 to 0.637. Finally, there were no gender difference in the scores of two subscales. Conclusion： The CMILQ has good reliability and validity and it can be used to assess individual meaning in life.