行政公益诉讼笔谈（下）——行政公益诉讼的原告资格

Comment on Administrative Public Welfare Action （Continued）

《行政诉讼法》的修改已经提上议事日程，行政公益诉讼何去何从，已经到了无法回避的地步。近年来，围绕行政公益诉讼问题可谓是观点纷呈。热吹捧者有之，冷思考者有之，反对者也不乏。为使我国行政公益诉讼制度的最终确立有一个坚实的理论基础．尚有大量的问题需要进一步探讨。这里发表的一组笔谈是黄学贤教授主持的司法部项目《行政公益诉讼研究》（06SFB5007）的阶段性成果，本刊分上、下两部分刊登。由于是笔谈，课题组成员（黄学贤教授的几位研究生：唐小娟、杨新登、李晓玲等）观点不强求一致，其宗旨是为《行政诉讼法》的修改提供一孔之见。

The amendment of Administrative Procedure Law has been put on the agenda, and the direction of the administrative public welfare action has come to a stage that can not be avoided. In recent years, as to the issue, different people have different opinions： some peolpe tout it, some give it a cool thinking, and some oppose it. In order to eventually make a solid theoretical foundation for China＇s administrative system of public welfare action, there are a lot of issues need further study. Here is a comment on it, which is part of the achievement of Professor Huang Xuexian＇s item funded by the Ministry of Justice Research on the Administrative Public Welfare Action （06 SFBSOO7）. Because it is a comment, different opinions are allowed, whose purpose is to provide some reasonable advice for its amendment.