论民事裁判的实体公正

On the Substantive Justice of Civil Administration

近年来,我国法学界和司法工作者在纠正"重实体、轻程序"现象的同时,产生了过分强调程序公正的倾向,并导致司法裁判不公现象的增多。从实证的角度看,程序公正是实体公正的基础和前提,实体公正是程序公正的依归和检验标准,二者相互依存、相互促进。程序公正与实体公正是一致的,但有时也会产生冲突,这时,法官就要根据价值衡量来决定取舍,不能简单地一律程序公正优先,也不能把实体公正作为惟一的追求。从我国的实际情况出发,在民事诉讼实务中要实现裁判的实体公正,必须在民事裁判结果中体现法律和情理的统一,以取得裁判法律效果和社会效果的统一,实现法律公正与社会主流正义观的统一。

Recently, the law circle and the judicial personnel＇s correcting the fact of ＂more substance, and less procedure＂ generates a trend of over-emphasized procedural justice, and leads to more unfair judicial administration. In practical experience, the procedural justice should be the foundation and premise of the substantive justice, and the substantive justice should be the goal and criterion of the procedural justice, which are independent each other. Therefore, when conflicts occur, the judge should determine it according the value, and cannot take the substantive justice as final goal. According to our country＇s situation, in order to realize the substantive justice in the administration, it is supposed to embody the unity of law and sense, legal effect and social result, and legal justice and main social view of justice.