魏晋南北朝“史例中兴”问题再探讨

Further Discussion About "Resurgence of Unattached Article of History Compilation Format" During 220—581 Period

从史学发展的背景出发,从"史例"之作是否起于《春秋》、例之为体《左传》后曾否中绝及"中兴"之例是否始于干宝等方面对刘知幾的"史例中兴"说进行了考察,认为刘氏此说值得商榷,《春秋》经传及秦汉之时的史书并未有史例,至魏晋南北朝时期,由于《春秋》经传注解尚"通"、史学发展等因素的影响,干宝在所著《晋纪》中始立叙例,此后诸史相沿,史例才发展成为一种文体,反映了此时期人们对史书编纂探讨的深入,对后世学术的发展产生了深远的影响。

In the context of the history development, this research analyzes whether the ＂unattached article of history compilation format＂ began with ChunQiu and whether it vanished after ZuoZhuan, and whether its resurgence started with Ganbao. Based on textual analysis and scholarly critical analysis, the author pointes out that there should be some further discussion about Liu Zhiji＇s ＂interrelated theory＂. ChunQiu and the histories such as ShiJi and HanShu before 220 were without the ＂unattached article of history compilation format＂. Because of the aspiration after fluency in chunqiu＇s annotation and the influence of the development of historical research, etc. GanBao created the ＂unattached article of history compilation format＂ in his JinJi and made it developed into a flourishing style during 220-581 period.