期刊文献+

农产品质量分级与消费者福利:原理、现实及政策含义 被引量:17

Agriculture Product Quality Grading and Consumers’ Welfare:Theory,Practice and Policy Implication
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着人均收入水平的提高,消费者对农产品的关注日益由数量转向质量。基于消费者偏好差异的农产品质量分级,理论上可以提高消费者福利,反过来也会激励农业生产者优化资源配置,促进我国农业现代化。而美国农产品质量分级的实际情况表明,由于分级标准的制定由生产者和贸易者决定,并且消费者偏好难以把握,现行分级大多数是满足流通之需而不是从满足消费者偏好差异出发,不过这种情形正在发生改变。 As people’s income rises, consumers have paid more attention to agriculture product quality than quantity. Based on consumers’ preference difference, agriculture product quality grading can improve consumers’ welfare and then motivates farmers to optimize resources inputs, which change the traditional agriculture to modern one. The practice of agriculture product grading in America shows that the main goal of grading is to facilitate trade not to fulfill consumers’ preference difference. However, the situation is changing now. The theory and practice about agriculture product quality grading and consumers’ welfare will give some policy implication for agriculture product grading in China.
作者 赵卓 于冷
出处 《农业经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期20-24,共5页 Issues in Agricultural Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:70673063)项目"实施农业标准化推进现代农业建设研究"的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ferrier, P. , Russell Lamb ,2007, Government regulation and quality in the US beef market, Food Policy 32 (2007) :84 -97
  • 2Freebairn, J. W. , 1967, Grading as a Market Innovation, Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Vol. 35, No. 03, Sep:147 - 162
  • 3Gale, F. , and Huang, K. ,2007, Demand for food quantity and quality in China. ( Economic research report ( United States Dept. of Agriculture Economic Research Service) :32
  • 4Hunter, B. T. , 1994, Food grades don't always serve consumers, Consumers' Research Magazine, Vol. 77, Issue 6:28 - 32
  • 5Jesness,O. B. ,1933,The Economic Basis of Market Grades,Journal of Farm Economics,Vol. 15,No. 4:708 -717
  • 6Kohls, R. L. , Uhl. , J. N. , 1998, Marketing of Agricultural Products (8^th), Prentice Hall :294 - 311
  • 7Ligon,E. (2001). Quality and Grading Risk. In R. Just and R. Pope,eds. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in U. S. Agriculture. Boston MA : Kluwer Academic Press Publishers ,2001:353 - 369
  • 8Nybroten,N. (1953). Consumer Choice and Research in Standards for Consumer Grades. Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1. (Feb. ,1953) :135 -139
  • 9Waite, W. C. , Consumer Grades and Standards, Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2. ( Apr. , 1954 ) :248 -253
  • 10Zusman, P. , 1967, A Theoretical Basis for Determination of Grading and Sorting Schemes, Joumal of Farm Economics, Vol. 49, No. 1, Part 1. (Feb. ,1967) :89 - 106

二级参考文献4

  • 1于冷,吴颖雯.实施农业标准化 提高中国农业经济素质[J].上海管理科学,2003,25(6):54-56. 被引量:3
  • 2John B Penson, Oral Capps, C Parr Rosson: Introduction to Agricultural Econmnics (2nd edition), Prentice Hall, 1999.
  • 3H Evan Drtmamond, John W Goodwin: Agricultural Economics, Prentice Hall, 2001.
  • 4Richard L Kohls, Joseph N Uhl: Marketing of Agricultural Products (8th edition), Prentice Hall, 1998.

共引文献153

同被引文献176

引证文献17

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部