期刊文献+

现代与传统审计风险模型的比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在新审计准则的基础上,对现代和传统审计风险模型内涵进行了比较,指出了传统模型的缺陷,并进一步说明了现代模型的优点,标志着我国审计准则国际趋同的特点。
作者 钱莉 龚超超
出处 《商场现代化》 2009年第3期340-340,共1页
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1审计.周勤业等[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996.231.
  • 2AICPA. 2002. Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards: Understanding the Entity and its Environment and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement, paragraph 36.
  • 3APB. 2000. Developments in the Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms. APB monographCOSO. 2003. Enterprise Risk Management Framework. Exposure Draft.
  • 4Eilifsen, A. , Knechel, W. R. and Wallage, P. 2001. Application of the Business Risk Audit Model: A Field Study, Accounting Horizons, Sep., p193-207.
  • 5Erickson, M. M. , B. W. Mayhew, and W. L. Felix, Jr. 1996. Understanding the Client's Business: Lessons from Lincoln Savings and Loan, unpublished working paper.
  • 6POB. 2000. The Panel on Audit Effectiveness: Report and Recommendations.
  • 7Power, M. K.. 2003. Auditing and the Production of Legitimacy. Accounting, Organization and Society. May, pp379 -394.
  • 8Timothy B. Bell, Frank O. Marrs, Ira Solomom and Howard Thomas. 1997. Auditing Organizations Through a Strategic - Systems Lens. KPMG monograph.
  • 9Timothy B. Bell and Ira Solomon. 2002. Cases in Strategic - System Auditing, KPMG and University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.
  • 10Timothy B. Bell and Arnold M. Wright, eds. , Auditing Practice, Research, and Education: A Productive Collaboration (AICPA, 1995).

共引文献279

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部