物之瑕疵担保责任和违约责任的关系

The Relationship Between the Liability for Warranty Against Defects and Liability for Breach of Contract

关于我国《合同法》中规定的物之瑕疵担保责任与违约责任的关系问题,在我国学者之间存在着不同的主张。分析表明,所谓的"相对独立说"或"独立说",在我国的制度背景下没有实质性的意义,物之瑕疵担保责任也没有"相对独立"的必要性。结合这一观点,在论证中指出我国《合同法》相关规定在体系和移植方面存在着的不合理性。

There are different opinions on relationship between the liability for warranty against defects and the liability for breach of contract among native scholars. Analysis shows that the so-called ＂theory of relative independence＂ or theory of independence has no significance under the background of our institution development. The liability for warranty against defects is not necessarily relatively independent. Integrated with this opinion, this thesis points out that there exists some unreasonableness in some regulations of Chinese Law of Contract in aspects of system and transplantation.