期刊文献+

西比灵与丙戊酸钠预防性干预偏头痛患儿疗效观察 被引量:10

Prospective,randomized and comparative study on the sibelium and valproate prophylactic treatments for children with migraine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究偏头痛儿童的预防性药物干预,探讨安全而有效的干预方法。方法采取前瞻、随机、对照、开放性的研究,将2003年7月至2005年9月在复旦大学附属儿科医院神经内科门诊就诊的200例需要干预治疗的中度偏头痛患儿随机分为两组,分别选用西比灵(氟桂利嗪)和丙戊酸钠,干预2个月后,采用《儿童生活质量量表PedsQl4.0》和头痛指数两项指标来考核疗效。结果生活质量得分情况:西比灵组总分从干预前(68.27±11.06)升至干预后(82.07±5.36),丙戊酸钠组总分从(71.82±9.03)升至(82.74±5.36),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组间生活质量改善效果相似(P>0.05)。头痛发作指数改变情况:西比灵组从(10.45±7.25)降至(2.20±2.75);丙戊酸钠组从(9.81±7.58)降至(2.03±2.50),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组间改善效果相似(P>0.05)。结论合理有效的预防性治疗方法将大大改善偏头痛患儿的生活质量并减轻头痛指数,西比灵和丙戊酸钠对偏头痛儿童的预防均有效。 Objective To assess the efficacy of pharmacological prophylactic treatments for migraine in children, and to study an appropriate and safe therapy benefitial to pediatric migrainuer. Methods PedsQ14. 0 and headache index were used to assess the effect of Sibelium (Flunarizine) and valproate (VPA) after provided to the children with migraine. The two groups of 200 moderate migrainuers were compared in a prospective, randomized, controlled and open-label trial. Resuits With the aspect of comparision between sibelium and VPA,both showed effects on increasing the quality of life of children with migraine. Total score of with Sibelium increased from 68. 27 ± 11.06 to 82. 07 ± 5.36 ,while the group with VPA increased from ( 71.82 ± 9. 03 ) to ( 82. 74 ± 5.36 ). Each group P 〈 0. 05, within group P 〉 0. 05. The two pharmacological ways were also effective to decrease the index of headache. The group with Sibelium decrease from ( 10. 45 ± 7. 25) to (2. 20 ±2. 75) ; the group with VPA decreased from (9. 81 ±7.58) to (2. 03 ±2. 50) ,Each group P 〈0. 05, within group P 〉 0. 05. Comparing the two groups, there were no significance about quality of life and headache index. Conclusion Children with migraine benefit from appropriate prophylactic therapy. Sibelium and VPA could also be used for children with migraine.
出处 《中国实用儿科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期46-49,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics
关键词 偏头痛 儿童生活质量量表4.0 预防性干预 migraine PedsQL 4. 0 prophylactic treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Steiner TJ. Classification of primary headaches[J]. Neurology ,2004,63 ( 3 ) :427 - 735.
  • 2Lipton RB, Liberman JN, Kolodner KB. Migraine headache disability and health-related quality-of-life: a population-based case-control study from England [ J ]. Cephalalgia, 2003,23 ( 6 ) : 441 - 450.
  • 3Lewis DW, Ashwal S, Hershey A, et al. Practice parameter: pharmacological treatment of migraine headache in children and adolescents: report of the American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society [ J ]. Neurology, 2004 , 28 ; 63 ( 12 ) : 2215 - 24.
  • 4Hershey AD, Powers SW, Vockell AL, et al. PedMIDAS : development of a questionnaire to assess disability of migraines in children. Neurology,2001,57 : 2034 -2203.
  • 5Lewis, DW. Toward the definition of childhood migraine [ J ]. Curr Opin Pediatr,2004,16 (6) : 628 - 636.
  • 6Damen L, Bruijn J, Koes BW, et al. Prophylactic treatment of migraine in children : a systematic review of non-pharmacological trials [J]. Cephalalgia,2006,26(4) :373 -383.
  • 7Powers SW, Patton SR, Hommel KA, et al. Quality of life in childhood migraines: clinical impact and comparison to other chronic illnesses [ J ]. Pediatrics,2003,112 ( 1 ) : 1 - 5.
  • 8Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0 : reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations [ J ]. Med Care, 2001,39(8) : 800 -812.
  • 9Caruso JM, Brown WD, Exil G, et al. The Efficacy of divalproex sodium in the prophylactic treament of children with migraine [ J ]. Headache,2000,40 (8) :672 - 676.
  • 10Serdaroglu G,Erhan E ,Tekgul H ,et al. Sodium valproate prophylaxis in childhood migraine [ J ]. Headache, 2002,42 ( 8 ) : 819 - 822.

同被引文献67

引证文献10

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部