期刊文献+

地震中伤员大规模转运时的病情评估 被引量:1

Evaluation of patient' s condition during massive transportation of earthquake
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对四川汶川地震中需要大规模转运伤员的病情评估进行分析探讨。方法总结四川汶川地震中我医疗救治转运小组接收的43例伤员,按照高级创伤生命支持的原则进行检伤,采用院前指数法(PHI)评分,对伤员进行综合病情评估。结果经以上原则及评分进行病情评估的43例伤员中,5例伤员在病情评估过程中考虑病情不稳定,存在较大潜在危险,拒绝转运,其余38例安全转运。结论在地震期间大规模转运伤员时,采用高级创伤生命支持的检伤原则及院前指数法(PHI)创伤评分进行病情评估,是伤员成功转运的关键。 Objective To analyse and discuss the evaluation of patient' s condition during massive injured transportation in Sichuan Wenshuan earthquake. Method 43 injured in earthquake taken by our medical save transportation team were evaluated by Prehospital Index ( PHI ) score and based on ad- vanced trauma life support principle. Result 5 patients were judged as unstable condition with high po- tential risk, therefore refused to take long distance transportation; the rest 38 injured were transported smoothly. Conclusion During the phase of massive injured transportation during earthquake, the adoption of advanced trauma life support principle and Prehospital Index ( PHI ) score to evaluate patient ' s condition are the successful key of patients transportation.
作者 郝伟
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期93-95,共3页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 地震 高级创伤生命支持 院前指数法(PHI) Earthquake Advanced trauma life support Prehospital index ( PHI )
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1Schultz CH, Koenig KL, Noji EK. A medical disaster response to reduce hnmediate mortality after an earthquake[J]. N Engl J Meal, 1996, 334(7) :438444.
  • 2Osaki Y, Minowa M. Factors associated with earthquake deaths in the great hanshin-awaji earthquake 1995[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2001,153 (2) : 153-156.
  • 3Sever MS, Vanholder R, Lameire N. Management of crush-related injuries after disasters[j] .N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(10):1052-1063.
  • 4Fero G. Assessment of major and nfinor events that occurred in Italy during the last century using a disaster severity scale score[J]. Prehosp Disast Med, 2005, 20(5): 316-323.
  • 5Koenig KL, Dinerman N, Kuehl AE. Disaster nomenclature-A functional impact approach: The PICE system[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 1996,3 (7) : 723-727.
  • 6Takahashi A, Ishii N, Kawashima T, et al. Asscssment of medical response capacity in the time of disaster: the estinkated formula of hospital treatment capacity (HTC), the nmximum receivable number of patients in hospital[J]. Kobe J Med Sci, 2007, 53(5): 189-198.
  • 7Sheng ZY. Medical support in the Tangshan earthquake: a review of the numagement of mass casualties and certain major injuries[J] .J Trauma, 1987, 27(10): 1130- 1135.
  • 8American medical association committee on the medical aspects of automotive safety:rating the severity of tissue damage.I.The abbreviated scale.JAMA,1971,215:277-280.
  • 9Baker SP,O'Neill B,Haddon W Jr,et al.The injury severity score:a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.J Trauma,1974,14:187-196.
  • 10Copes WS,Champion HR,Sacco WJ,et al.Progress in characterizing anatomic injury.J Trauma,1990,30:1200-1207.

共引文献129

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部