期刊文献+

论公司治理与社会责任 被引量:13

On Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从利益相关者视角考虑公司治理与社会责任的关系,将肩负社会责任作为衡量管理者履行受托责任、保障利益相关者利益程度的重要标准之一,认为社会责任的实质是公司与各利益相关者间利益和责任关系的体现。利益相关者理论扩大了公司委托者范围,其影响并非是公司负担的加重,更深层次上讲是公司长期发展的需要。相对独立的公司第三方监督机制具有作为监督者的先天优势,扮演着管理者与利益相关者间桥梁与安全带的双重角色。 The paper investigates corporate governance and social responsibility from the perspective of stakeholders.The paper takes fulfilling social responsibilities as an important criterion by which we can judge whether manager are fulfilling their social responsibilities or not,and thinks that the essence of social responsibility is the reflection of the relationships of the benefits and accountabilities of all stakeholders.The theory of stakeholders enlarges the scope of principals of corporate.However,it is not a burden but a need for long term development for corporate in deep thought.The supervision mechanism based mainly on relatively independent third party has the adveantage over the other supervision mechanism,and plays the dual role of the bridge and buffering zone between managers and stakeholders.
出处 《中南财经政法大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期124-128,共5页 Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词 公司治理 社会责任 受托责任 利益相关者 Corporate Governance Social Responsibilities Trustee Responsibility Stakeholders
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Freeman. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach[M]. Boston: Pitman Press. 1984.
  • 2Wheeler. D. , Colbert. B. ,Freeman. R. E. Focusing on Value:Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World[J]. Journal of General Management,2003,28(3):1--28.
  • 3伍中信.受托责任论——会计本质理论的重新确认(摘登)[J].会计研究,1996(11):35-35. 被引量:12
  • 4Hillman, Keim. G. D. Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues.. Whafs the Bottom Line? [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001, (22): 125--139.
  • 5Simon. H. Models of Man[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1957.
  • 6何大安.行为经济人有限理性的实现程度[J].中国社会科学,2004(4):91-101. 被引量:154
  • 7Boatright. J. R.. Ethics in Finance[M]. Oxford:Blackwell. 1999.
  • 8Williamson. O. E. Corporate Finance and Co rporate Governance[J]. Journal oI Finance. 1988,43(3):567 -- 591.
  • 9E. Fama. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, (88):287-- 306.
  • 10Quinn. D. ,Jones. T. An Agent Morality View of Business Policy[J]. Academy of Management Review,1995, 20(1) :22--42.

二级参考文献13

  • 1西蒙.《理性选择行为模型》[A]..《西蒙选集》[C].首都经贸大学出版社,2002年..
  • 2贝克尔.《人类行为经济分析》[M].上海三联书店,1996年..
  • 3休谟.《人类理解研究》[M].商务印书馆,1997年..
  • 4韦森.《习俗的本质与生发机制探源》[A]..《转型与增长》[C].上海远东出版社,2002年..
  • 5卢瑟福.《经济学中的制度:老制度主义与新制度主义》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2000年..
  • 6Conlisk, John, Why Bounded Rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, vol.34 (2), June 1996.
  • 7Simon H. Models of Man. New York: Wiley, 1957.
  • 8Harsanyi J C. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridger University Press, 1977.
  • 9Shiller R J. Market Volatility and Investor Behavior. American Economic Review, vol. 80, no. 2, 1990.
  • 10Delong B, A Shleifer, Summers L & R Waldman, Noistrader Risk in Financial Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (4), 1990.

共引文献163

同被引文献191

引证文献13

二级引证文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部