摘要
现有的物权法著作通常把物权变动规范模式分为意思主义、债权形式主义与物权形式主义。该分析框架有明显缺陷,应从物权行为立法选择与公示在物权变动中的法律意义两个维度构建更为精密的新分析框架。现行《物权法》采用的是物权行为否定与公示大折衷主义的规范模式。
Existing literatures on jus in rem (rights on property) always divide rule modes of variations of jus in rem into the doctrine of will, doctrine of obligation form, and doctrine of property fight form. This analytical framework has its shortcomings obviously. It is desirable to establish a new analytical framework in new dimensions with the factors of legislative choice of juristic act of jus in rem and the legal significance of public summons in variations of jus in rem. The property law in China now employs the rule mode of denying juristic act of jus in rem and compromise in public summons.
出处
《当代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第1期101-106,共6页
Contemporary Law Review
基金
国家社科私权一般理论与民法体系构造模式的关系研究(07CFX039)
关键词
物权变动
规范模式
物权行为
公示
物权法
variations of jus in rem
rule mode
juristic act of jus in rem
public summons