《左传》叙事与解经语不合的原因及其影响

Disagreement between Zuo Zhuan Narrartion and Its Interpretation of Chun Qiu-Causes and Effects

《左传》叙事与解经语不相协和是一个关系到《左传》是否传《春秋》的重要问题,故争论双方都对这种不合的原因做出了不同的解释,无法达成共识。绕开《左传》是否传《春秋》的问题,从比较中立的立场出发,《左传》叙事与解经语不合的原因,可能是由于《左传》叙事既有解释经义的功能,又有表达叙事者自身历史认识与评价的功能,超出了"春秋大义"的限定,从而导致《左传》叙事与解经语之间存在张力与不合,并使得《左传》叙事在后世义理的标准下遭到严厉批评和质疑。

For a long time many controversies have been raised about Zuo Zhuan, such as its writer, authenticity, timing and its relationship with another history book Chun Qiu, among which the disagreement between Zuo Zhuan narration and its interpretation of Chun Qiu is most appealing due to its high correlation with the unsolved academic debate whether or not Zuo Zhuan is an interpretation of Chun Qiu.. Based on the objective textual study of Zuo Zhuan, the paper points out that such a disagreement may come from the functional duality of Zuo Zhuan narration, namely interpretation of Chun Qiu and narrator＇s own critique of history.