期刊文献+

屈光参差性弱视的多焦视觉诱发电位 被引量:2

Study of multifocal visual evoked potential in anisometropic amblyopes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究屈光参差性弱视患者弱视眼与对侧眼的多焦视觉诱发电位(multifocal visual evoked potential,mVEP)的特征性变化。方法采用美国EDI公司生产的VERIS ScienceTM 4.2多焦电生理系统对31例屈光参差性弱视患者、30例正常人双眼分别进行图形mVEP检测,以潜伏期和振幅为分析指标,进行屈光参差性弱视眼、对侧眼和正常对照眼三组mVEP的对比研究。结果在六个离心度上,弱视眼反应振幅密度较其对侧眼和正常眼均显著降低,潜伏期延长(P<0.01)。在六个离心度上弱视眼mVEP的波形异常程度均与弱视眼视力呈负相关(P<0.05),而与屈光参差度之间均无明显相关性(P>0.05)。结论屈光参差性弱视患者mVEP具有特征性改变,表明弱视患者的视皮层与视觉传导通路均存在损害,中心区损害重于周边区,mVEP波形的异常在一定程度上能够反映出弱视患者视力的异常程度。mVEP检查可为弱视的诊断、治疗和预后判断提供客观依据。 Objective To study the characteristic changes in multifocal visual evoked potential (mVEP) in anisometropic ambly- opes. Methods Multifocal pattern VEPs of both eyes of 31 ani- sometropic amblyopes and 30 normal subjects were recorded by a VERIS ScienceTM 4.2 muhifocal visual evoked response imaging sys- tem (EDI Company, USA). The lateneies and amplitudes of the P waves were analyzed. Changes were investigated by comparing the anlblyopic eyes, the fellow eyes of the patients, and normal eyes. Results At six eccentricities, the amplitudes of the P waves of the amblyopic eyes were reduced and the latencies of the P waves were markedly prolonged compared to the fellow eyes and normal eyes hut the abnormalities of the mVEP waveforms were not corre- lated with the degree of anisometropia. Conclusion The results from the mVEP of anisometropic amblyopes showed characteristic changes, indicating the existence of impairment in the visual path- way. The visual acuity of amhlyopic eyes is correlated with the ab- normality of the waveform of the mVEP; worse visual acuity is concomitant with a more abnormal mVEP. These results suggest that mVEP can provide evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of amblyopia.
作者 刘晖 陈霞
出处 《眼视光学杂志》 2009年第1期65-68,共4页 Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology
关键词 屈光参差 弱视 多焦视觉诱发电位 anisometropia amblyopia multifocal visual evoked potential
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1李凤鸣.眼科全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.2575.
  • 2Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man Ⅰ:The photopic luminance response [J]. Vision Res, 1992,32(2) :433.
  • 3Klistomer AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential:improving objective detection of local visual field defects [J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1998,39(6): 937-950
  • 4Graham SL, Klistorner A, Grigg JR, et al. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma:asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits[J]. J Glaucoma,2000,9(1):10-19.
  • 5Levi DM, Manny RE. The pathophysiology of amblyopia. Electrophysiological studies[J]. Ann NY Acad Sci,1983,388(1): 243 -263.
  • 6Hubel DH, Wiesle TN. Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young visually inexperienced kitten[J]. J Neur Ophysiol, 1963,26(5):994.
  • 7Von Noorden GK. Histological studies of the visual system in monkeys with experimental amblyopia[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1973,12(10):727-738.
  • 8Von Noorden GK, Grawford ML. The lateral geniculate nucleus in human strabismic amblyopia [J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1992,33(9) : 2729-2732.
  • 9Sokol S, Hansen VC, Moskowitz A, et al. Evoked potential and preferential looking estimates of visual acuity in pediatric patients[J]. Ophthalmology, 1983,90(5) :552-562.
  • 10封利霞,赵堪兴.斜视性弱视多焦VEP与多焦ERG的对比研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2005,23(2):150-154. 被引量:13

二级参考文献17

  • 1阴正勤 方谦逊 等.儿童弱视的图形视觉诱发电位分析[J].中华眼科杂志,1988,24(5):268-268.
  • 2Baker FH, Gfigg P, Von Noorden. Effects of visual deprivation and strabismus on the responses of neurons in the visual cortex o fthe monkey, including studies on the striate and prestriate cortex in th enormalanimal. Brain Research, 1974, 66:185-208.
  • 3Chino YM, Cheng H, Smith Ⅲ EL, et al. Early discordant binocular vision disrupts signal transfer in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994, 91: 6938-6942.
  • 4Roelfsema PR, Konig P, Engel AK. Reduced synchronization in the visual cortex of cats with strabismic amblyopia. Eur J Neurosci, 1994, 6:1645-1655.
  • 5Rauschecker JP. Mechanisms of visual plasticity: Hebb synapses,NMDA receptors, and beyond. Physiological Rev, 1996, 71:587-615.
  • 6Thomas J. Normal and amblyopie contrast sensitivity functions in central and peripheral retinae. Invest Ophthalmol Vis ,Sci, 1978,17:746-753.
  • 7Kirsehen DG, Flom MC. Visual acuity at different retinal loci of eccentrically fixating functional amblyopes. Am J Optom physiol Opt, 1978, 55:144-150.
  • 8Levi DM, Klein SA, Aitsebaomo AP. Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers. Vision Res, 1984, 24: 789-800.
  • 9Kubova Z, Kuba M, Juran J. Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses.Vision Res, 1996, 36 (1): 181-190.
  • 10Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1998, 39:937-950.

共引文献1510

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部