摘要
科学的证实主义、证伪主义以及舍弃证实与证伪方法的非理性主义、新历史主义各流派都面临着两难困境,主要是由于科学哲学家选择科学合理性解释模式的单一化造成的。用辩证观点来理解证实和证伪、历史和逻辑、价值和理性之间的互补互斥的多元关系具有巨大的优越性,可以实现对西方科学合理性理论的超越。
Logical positivism and falsification, as well as irrationalism and new historicism have encountered a dilemma because the one-sided interpretation mode provided by the philosopher of science. The same drawback is entrenched for irrationalism and new historicism in rejection of the former two trends. Dialectics is the only way to solve the problem. Compared with rationality theory, a dialectical perspective proves to be transcending in the interpretation of the mutually exclusive and complementary relationships between positivism and falsification, history and logic, value and rationality.
出处
《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第1期6-11,共6页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
唯物辩证法
科学合理性
逻辑
历史
价值
超越
Materialist Dialectics
rationality of science
logic
history
value
transcendence
