期刊文献+

双元型组织构建研究前沿探析 被引量:48

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文界定了双元型组织适用的外部条件和内部因素,阐述了各类双元的内涵,并剖析了结构型双元和情境型双元的优势、局限性及其适用情境;随后描述了双元型组织的构建过程,探讨了各阶段的主要活动和管理要领;最后概括了三种类型双元之间的关系。
作者 周俊 薛求知
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期50-57,共8页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 教育部985平台项目<中国企业国际竞争力>
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1He,Z L,and Wong, P K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15:481-494.
  • 2Gibson,C B, and Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47 (2) : 209-226.
  • 3Venkatraman, N, Lee,C H, and Lyer,B. Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector[R]. CIP Working Paper, 2007.
  • 4Ebben, J J, and Johnson, A C. Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26 : 1 249-1 259.
  • 5Kyriakopoulos,K, and Moorman, C. Trade-offs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2004,21:219-240.
  • 6Gupta, A K, Smith, K G, and Shalley, C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):693-706.
  • 7Burgelman, R A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002,47:325-357.
  • 8Lewis, M W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000,25 : 760-777.
  • 9March,J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, (2):71-87.
  • 10March,J G. Continuity and change in theories of organizational action[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,41:278 -287.

同被引文献900

引证文献48

二级引证文献771

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部