期刊文献+

成年和青少年Beagle犬下颌骨植入微型支抗种植体的组织学比较研究 被引量:3

Histological Study of Miniscrew Implanted in Lower Mandibles of Juvenile and Adult Beagle Dogs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨成年和青少年Beagle犬下颌骨植入的微种植体不同愈合时间的组织学差异,为青少年患者应用微植体支抗提供指导。方法6只成年Beagle犬和6只青少年Beagle犬,选择下颌第四前磨牙(P4)和第一磨牙(M1)牙根间间隙,M1近远中牙根间间隙为植入部位,共植入48颗微种植体。愈合3周和12周后,对含微种植体的标本进行组织学检查,并进行骨整合率计算。结果微种植体在观察期无松动、脱落。微种植体与周围组织有良好的生物相容性,周围骨组织中破骨细胞和成骨细胞的功能活跃,骨整合率随着愈合时间的延长而增高。青少年Beagle犬微种植体-骨整合率术后3周低于成年Beagle犬的微种植体-骨整合率;但术后12周却高于成年Beagle犬的微种植体-骨整合率。结论青少年Beagle犬的骨质量低,但生长发育快,经过12周愈合,能弥补青少年Beagle犬早期骨结合率的不足。 Objective To examine the histological discrepancies between juvenile and adult Beagle dogs at different concrescence times after miniscrew implants. Methods Miniscrew implants were performed in six juvenile Beagle dogs and six adult Beagle dogs. The space between the fourth premolar root and first molar root, and the spaces in distal and mesial of M1 root were picked up for the implants of the 48 miniscrews. The lower jaw specimens including the miniscrews were harvested 3 and 12 weeks after the implants for the histological examinations and bone implant contact (BIC) calculations. Results There was no miniscrew falling off or becoming loose. The miniscrews had favorable biological consistencies with the tissues around them. The osteoblasts and osteoclasts showed active functions in the peri-bones of the minisrews. The BIC became higher when the healing time was prolonged. The juvenile Beagle dogs had lower BIC than the adults 3 weeks after the implants. But the BIC of the juvenile dogs surpassed the adults 12 weeks after the implants. Conclusion The osseointegration of the miniscrews is hindered by the poorer bone quality of the juvenile Beagle dogs. But the early osseointegration deficiency can be made up by the rapid development and growth of the bones of the juvenile dogs.
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期81-84,共4页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金(批准号30470436) 贵州省优秀科技教育人才省长专业基金项目(S2005-2)资助
关键词 微种植体 支抗 前磨牙 早期加载 骨整合 Microscrew Anchorage Premolar Immediate loading Bone implant contact (BIC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 1997 , 31(4) : 763-767.
  • 2Bac SM, Park HS, Kyung HM, et al. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod,2002136(1) :298-302.
  • 3Freudenthaler JW, Bantleon HP. Bieortieal titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandlhle: a preliminary report on elinical applieations. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001, 12(5) : 358-363.
  • 4Park HS, Kyung HM, Sung JH. A simple method of molar uprighting with microimplant anchorage. J Clin Orthod,2002; 36(4) :592-596.
  • 5Sugawara J, Daimaruya T, Umemori M, et al. Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofae Orthop, 2004,125 (35):130-138.
  • 6Park HS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with microserew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod, 2004 , 74 (34) : 703-710.
  • 7Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, etal. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004 ; 19 (7) :100-106.
  • 8Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage-preliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop, 2004;65(1) :410-418.
  • 9Myawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, et al. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003 ; 124 (12):373-378.
  • 10张林,杨锡让.人体骨量变化研究发展[J].体育与科学,1999,20(2):7-10. 被引量:22

二级参考文献2

  • 1冯华,蒋协远.骨质疏松的危险因素及防治[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1997,3(2):66-71. 被引量:7
  • 2RE Murray,SFA Grant,DM Reld,SH Ralston. Polymorphisms of the interleukin-6 gene are associated with bone mineral density[J] 1996,Osteoporosis International(1):89

共引文献105

同被引文献31

  • 1于明香,王洪复,金慰芳,顾淑珠.体外培养人成骨细胞OPG、ODF基因表达与增龄相关[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2004,20(3):270-271. 被引量:7
  • 2Melsen B.Mini-implants:Where are we[J].J Clin Orthod,2005,39(9):539-547.
  • 3Carano A,Velo S,Leone P,et al.Clinical applications of the Miniscrew Anchorage System[J].J Clin Orthod,2005,39(1):9-24.
  • 4Chen Y,Shin HI,Kyung HM.Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2008,133 (1):44-50.
  • 5Wu JC,Huang JN,Zhao SF.Bicortical microimplant with 2 anchorage heads for mesial movement of posterior tooth in the beagle dog[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2007,132(3):353-359.
  • 6Chaddad K,Ferreira AF,Geurs N,et al.Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants[J].Angle Orthod,2008,78(1):107-113.
  • 7Motoyoshi M,Matsuoka M,Shimizu N.Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,36:695-699.
  • 8Park YC,Kim JK,Lee JS.Atlas of Contemporary Orthodontics[M].Seoul:Shin Hung International,2005:101-104; 145-161.
  • 9Liou EJ,Pai BC,Lin JC.Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,126(9):42-47.
  • 10Wada T,Nakashima T,Hiroshi N,et al.RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease[J].Trends Mol Med,2006,12(1):17-25.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部