期刊文献+

小切口微创人工全髋关节置换47例 被引量:1

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty in 47 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择2006-07/2008-04泸州医学院附属医院骨与关节外科收治的初次行人工全髋关节置换患者103例(107髋)。按置换方法不同分为2组:微创组47例47髋:股骨头坏死15例15髋,股骨颈骨折28例28髋,骨性关节炎4例4髋,采用改良后外侧切口、非骨水泥假体人工全髋关节置换;常规置换组56例60髋:按传统全髋关节置换方法进行;记录置换过程中、置换后出血量、切口长度、疼痛、关节功能恢复情况、住院时间,观察围手术期并发症。103例患者均获得随访,其中微创组随访3~11个月;常规置换组随访7~22个月。微创组置换过程中、置换后平均出血量少于常规置换组(P<0.05);常规置换组1例置换后发生深静脉栓塞,微创组无并发症发生;微创组随访3个月时Harris评分为(87.0±4.2)分,与常规置换组(89.0±3.8)分相近(P>0.05);提示微创组置换后关节功能恢复较快,疼痛轻,平均住院时间短于常规置换组。 From July 2006 to April 2008, 103 patients (107 hips) undergoing first total hip arthroplasty (THA) were selected from Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou Medical College. According to treatment methods, minimally invasive group (47 cases, 47 hips) including 15 cases (15 hips) of necrosis of the femoral head, 28 cases (28 hips) of femoral neck fracture, and 4 cases (4 hips) of osteoarthfitis, were treated with small posterior skin incision and cementless prosthesis; the routine group (56 cases, 60 hips) underwent routine THA. The blood loss, incision length, pain, functional recovery, length of stay, and perioperative complications were recorded. 103 patients were followed up, of which minimally invasive THA was followed up for 3 11 months, and routine group followed up for 7-22 months. In the minimally invasive THA group, the patients had less blood loss (P 〈 0.05) and postoperative drainage with no complication. Deep venous embolism occurred in one case of routine group. There was no significant difference between minimally invasive and routine groups in postoperative Harris scores (87.0±4.2, 89.0±3.8, P 〉 0.05). The results show that minimally invasive THA has the advantages of less complication, shorter hospital stay, slighter pain and faster function recovery compared to routine THA.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第48期9537-9540,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1中华人民共和国国务院.医疗机构管理条例,1994:26
  • 2Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am 2004;35(2): 137-142
  • 3Waldman BJ. Minimally invasive total hip replacement and perioperative management: early experience. J South Orthop Assoc 2002; 11 (4):213-217
  • 4Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimat-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(4):701-710
  • 5Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 2002;25 ( 10): 1031 - 1043
  • 6Archibeck M J, White RE Jr. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;(429):232-238
  • 7DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(2): 123-128

共引文献300

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部