期刊文献+

大股东控制与会计稳健性——来自中国A股上市公司的实证检验 被引量:22

Major Shareholders Control and Accounting Conservatism——Positive Test from Chinese A-share listed Companies
原文传递
导出
摘要 从供给与需求的角度就大股东控制对会计稳健性的影响进行理论分析,并引入股权结构变量,对Basu(1997)模型、Ball和Shivakumar(2005)模型进行修正后,通过构建一个检验体系,对大股东控制与会计稳健性的关系进行实证分析。研究显示,大股东控制与会计稳健性显著负相关,而且这种负相关关系并不对控制人性质敏感。这一结果表明,在我国这样的新兴市场中,股权结构对会计稳健性具有显著影响,大小股东之间的利益冲突已经成为我国上市公司中日益突出的代理问题,不管是在国有控股还是在非国有控股公司,大股东控制都具有显著的"壕沟防御效应"。 This paper analyzes the problem in theory from the perspective of supply and demand, and then considering the variable of shareholding structure into Basu (1997) model and Ball and Shivakumar (2005) model, building a test system for the empirical analysis of the relationship between major shareholders control and accounting conservatism. Based on the data of Chinese A- share listed companies, the resuits show that major shareholders control and accounting conservatism show the significant negative correlation, and this correlation is not sensitive to the nature of major shareholders. This shows in China, an emerging market, shareholding structure has significant impact on accounting conservatism, and conflict of interest between major shareholders and minority shareholders in China' s listed companies has increasingly become prominent agency problem, whether in the state- controlled or non- state - controlled companies, major shareholders control has " Entrenchment Effects."
作者 董红星
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期117-124,共8页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词 股权结构 壕沟防御效应 利益协同效应 会计稳健性 ownership structure Entrenchment Effects Alignment Effects Accoungting Conservatism
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Givoly D, Hayn C. The Changing Time - series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals: Has Financial Reporting Become More Conservative I J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000,29:287- 320.
  • 2Basu S.The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1997,24:3- 37.
  • 3Watts R L, Zimmerman J L. Positive Accounting Theory[M]. New Jersey:Prentice- Hall, 1986.
  • 4Ball R, Robin A, Wu J S. Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accotmting Income in Four East Asian Countries[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2003,36: 235 - 270.
  • 5Givoly D, Hayn C, Natarajan A. Measuring Reporting Consevatism[Z]. SSRN Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University, 2006.
  • 6Ball R, Shivakumar L. Earnings Quality in U. K. Private Finns[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2005,39:83- 128.
  • 7Berle A, Means C. The Modem Corporation and Private Property[ M ]. New York:MacMillan, 1932.
  • 8Jensen M, Meckhng W. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976,3:305 - 360.
  • 9Grossman S,Hart O.Corporate Financial Sturcture and Managerial Incentive[J].Journal of Finaneial Economics,1980, (8) :21- 87.
  • 10Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986,94(3) :461 - 488.

二级参考文献37

同被引文献258

引证文献22

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部