期刊文献+

人类发展视角与可持续发展 被引量:8

Human Development:Perspective and Sustainability
原文传递
导出
摘要 可持续发展是当前全球共同关注的一个议题。传统的基于GDP的发展范式与基于人类发展的发展范式对可持续发展的看法有着不同内涵。基于GDP的发展范式对个人和社会福祉的考虑是不全面的,并缺乏内在的对资源与环境成本的考虑,不利于可持续发展的实现。与基于GDP的发展范式相比,人类发展视角则更关注人的可行能力的扩展和选择空间的扩大,涵盖了健康、教育、生活水平、参与性等诸多方面。基于人类发展视角的发展范式把发展的关注焦点重新集中于人的各方面可行能力的扩展上,这会内在地产生对资源、环境和生活质量的可持续要求。人类发展的诸多维度之间存在显著的相互促进作用,从人类发展视角思考可持续发展问题,有助于扩大政策的选择空间。基于人类发展视角的发展范式有着更显著的可持续发展内涵。 Sustainable development is a global concern.The development paradigms based on GDP and on human development will play a very different role in a sustainable development.While the former puts aside human and social happiness and neglects the cost in resources and environment,there is no sustainability in development.When compared with the former paradigm,the latter cares more for human potentialities,ranging from health,education,quality of decent life to social involvement,which all rely on sustainability of resources,environment and life quality.The paper analyzes some internal shortcomings underlying the GDP paradigm,and argues that human development paradigm is more appropriate to be used as a well-being measure and is more useful in promoting sustainable development,based on the objective,method and diversity of policy choices of human development paradigm.
出处 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期20-30,共11页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1联合国开发计划署驻华代表处,中国发展研究基金会.2005.《中国人类发展报告2005:追求公平的人类发展》,北京:中国对外翻译出版公司.
  • 2孙立平,2004.《断裂与转型:改革以来中国社会结构的变迁》.北京:清华大学出版社.
  • 3Anand, S. & A. K. Sen, 1996 ,“Sustainable Human Development: Concepts and Priorities ,” United Nations Development Programme, Discussion Paper Series.
  • 4Anand,S. & A. K. Sen,2000, "Human Development and Economic Sustainability," World Development, 28( 12), pp. 2029 - 2049.
  • 5Beugelsdijk, S. & T. V. Schaik, 2005,“ Social Capital and Growth in European Regions: An Empirical Test,” European Journal of Political Economy, 21 (2), pp. 301 - 324.
  • 6Brasington, D. M. & D. Hite, 2005,“ Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35 ( 1 ), pp. 57 - 82.
  • 7Christensen, P. P. , 1989," Historical Roots for Ecological Economics-biophysical Versus Allocative Approaches ," Ecological Economics, 1 ( 1 ) ,pp. 17 - 36.
  • 8Dornbusch,R. & S. Fischer, 1994, Macroeconomics, McGraw-Hill.
  • 9Fukuda-Parr, S. & A. K. Shiva Kumar,2004, Readings in Human Development : Concepts, Measures and Policies for a Development Paradigm, New Delhi:Oxford University Press.
  • 10Georgescu-Roegen, N. , 1975," Energy and Economic Myths," Southern Economic Journal, 41 ( 3 ), pp. 347 - 381.

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部