关于马克思“不平衡关系”问题的两次论争

Commentary on the Twice Debates of the Question of Marx "Unbalanced Relationship"

关于马克思"不平衡关系"问题,国内学术界曾有过两次较大的论争:一次发生在20世纪50年代末,一次发生在20世纪70年代末至80年代初。论者们都借着马克思的名义来说话,而且都自以为抓住了马克思的本意。但由于各自的前见不同,马克思在他们那里便呈现出了斑驳的色彩。这些斑驳的色彩交互冲突,相互否定,为凸显出一个真实的马克思提供了某种契机,同时也提示人们:在马克思思想框架内未必能获得彻底解决的"不平衡关系"问题,或许可以获得另一种途径的解决。

There are once two important debates in the literary circle about the question of Marx＂ Unbalanced Relationship＂. The first time was at the end of 1950s; the second from the end of 1970s to the beginning of 1980s. In contrast, the second debate is carried on the basis of studying theory. The debaters talk in the name of Marx, thinking that they have grasped Marx＇ s real intention. Because of their different opinions, Marx takes on mottled colors. These colors conflict with each other, negate with each other, thus providing an opportunity for the appearance of a real Marx. Meanwhile, it reminds us that within the framework of Marx theory the unsolved question＂ Unbalanced Relationship＂ which has puzzled two generations may be solved in a different way.