用尽体育行业内部救济原则反思--兼谈奥运会对我国社会治理的部分影响

On The Principle of "Exhaustion All Sports Industry Internal Remedies"——Also on the Olympic Games impact on the part of China's social governance

本文回顾了"用尽体育行业内部救济原则"在我国体育法学界确立的过程,对该原则的相关问题进行了反思。研究内容涉及司法管辖和体育自治、程序公正和时间利益等价值冲突。研究认为,"用尽体育行业内部救济原则"在司法机构和仲裁机构的实践不尽相同。法院基本不用特意考虑该原则,但是如果法院考虑减轻自身的诉讼压力,可能会要求当事人通过一定的行业内部救济。换言之,法院很可能支持"用过行业内部救济原则"而不是"用尽行业内部救济原则"。仲裁机构则更加坚持"用尽行业内部救济原则"。时间因素是"用尽行业内部救济原则"除外的首要考虑因素。

This paper reviews the established process of ＂Exhaustion All Internal Remedies＂ in China theoretical circles, reflects on some related issues about the principle. The study will address the value confliction between jurisdiction and sports autonomy, and procedural fairness and the interests of the time. Research indicates that the ＂Exhaustion All Internal Remedies＂ in the judiciary and the practice of arbitration bodies are not the same. Court not specifically take into account the basic principles, but if the court to consider reducing their own litigation pressure, the parties may be required by certain industries internal relief. In other words, the court is likely to support the ＂principles used intra--industry relief＂ rather than＂ Exhaustion All Internal Remedies ＂. Arbitral institutions are more adherence to the principle of ＂Exhaustion All Internal Remedies ＂. The time factor is considered as the exception for ＂Exhaustion All Internal Remedies＂.