期刊文献+

欧洲体育运动争议解决机制浅析 被引量:3

The Research on the European Sports Related Disputes Resolution System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧洲体育运动在国际奥林匹克运动中占据着非常重要的地位,其体育争议解决机制也对其他体育运动争议的解决有一定的参考价值。解决欧洲体育运动争议的组织包括政府和非政府的体育组织,解决方法主要有仲裁、调解和诉讼等。在一定程度上法院可以介入体育争议,但需要考虑纯粹性体育运动争议的可审查问题以及仲裁不干涉的原则。 European sport plays a very important role in the international Olympic arena, its sports-related disputes resolution system also has a model influence to others. The organizations that can deal with sports disputes are governmental organizations and non--governmental sports federations, and the solution of these disputes includes arbitration, mediation and litigation. The national court can intervene sports disputes to a certain degree, but it should take into account of the possibility of the examination of the purely sports disputes and the principle of non--arbitrability of similar disputes.
出处 《体育与科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期37-41,共5页 Sports & Science
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目 项目号:20070410485
关键词 欧洲 体育运动争议 解决机制 Europe sport dispute resolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Simon Gardiner. Sports Law (2nd edition) [M]. London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 2001: 251.
  • 2John A. Faylor. The Dismantling of German Champion: Katrin Krabbe and Her Ordeal with the German Track and Field Association and the International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF)[J]. Arbitration International, 2001,(2): 171.
  • 3Urs Scherrer. Preliminary Remedies in International Sports Law[M]. Zurich: Schulthess Polygraphiseher Verlag AG, 1999: 60.
  • 4Ian Blackshaw. Sport and Mediation[J]. Int'l Sports Law Journal, 2002, (2): 18.
  • 5Case 36/74, Walrave and Koch v. Association Union Cycliste Internationale [1974] ECR 1405.
  • 6Case 13/76, Dond v. Mantero E1976] ECR 1333.
  • 7Richard Parrish. Sports Law and Policy in the European Union [M]. Manchester University Press, 2003: 118.
  • 8Case T-313/02, David Meca-Medina & Igor Majcen v. Commission of the European Communities, at [41] and [44]
  • 9David Meca-Medina & Igor Majcen, ibid. at [42].
  • 10Joined cases C-51/96 and C-191/97, Christelle Deliege v. ASBL Ligue Franeophone de Judo and Others [2000] ECR I- 2549.

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部